Does the Gospels supply an 
 answer to the Christian dilemma of the True Sabbath? Paul writes that the 
 Sabbath celebrated by the Jews is an allegorical representation of the 
 Sabbath, as seen in his words that it is a 
"...shadow of things to come" 
 (Col 2:17 KJV). The Gospels are spiritual writings -- and they often 
 intentionally conflict with what would be understood from a literal or 
 historical perspective, in order to force the reader to seek the spiritual 
 meaning. The prediction was that the Son of Man would be three days in the 
 tomb -- and yet, if you count the days as reported in the scriptures, they 
 are two. And this is because the Christians who read the scriptures in the 
 manner of the Pharisees who threw away the Key of Knowledge, not only do not 
 understand the spiritual meaning of the three days, but they further do not 
 understand the portrayal of a Sabbath following the Passover. They therefore 
 attempt to doctrinally force the interpretation the following day after the 
 Sabbath as the first day of the week -- or for those who worship the sun-god 
 in the manner of the pagan Christians, Sunday. On the other hand, the Greek 
 word used to describe the day of the supposed resurrection, is 
mia ton 
 sabbaton -- or, if literally translated, "one of the Sabbaths". But the 
 conflict over the day of the week is seen in the Christians inability to 
 understand what is meant by 
"one of the Sabbaths" -- which is exactly how 
 the Greek text reads. And the grave misunderstanding of most Bible readers 
 is seen when they fail to perceive that the allegorical symbol of the 
 Sabbath is not the actual Sabbath that is the objective of the scriptures 
 which is portrayed in the biblical term 
"one of the Sabbaths". As noted in 
 many places in this article, Eden is the embodiment of the Sabbath -- and it 
 is the return to Eden while still alive in the body (see 
http://GateOfEden.com), 
 that is the true objective of the scriptures and the teachings of Jesus and 
 TheWay. From a true spiritual perspective, the Jews have never celebrated a 
 Sabbath -- and what they observe, is an allegorical portrayal of the Sabbath 
 that they lack the depth of understanding to comprehend the meaning of. And 
 this reality which is not understood by either the Jews, or the pagan 
 Christians, is also presented in the meaning of the verse that was removed 
 from the Gospel of Luke by the sun-worshipping Christians -- i.e.,
 "On the 
 same day, He (Jesus) beholding a man laboring on the Sabbath, said to him: 
 Man if thou knowest what thou doest, blessed art thou; if however thou dost 
 not know, cursed art thou and a transgressor of the law" (see 
http://BibleCorruption.com ). 
 If the Passover is correctly embraced from a spiritual perspective (see 
http://Ebionite.com/Easter.htm ) 
 -- in contradistinction to the allegorical Passover of the Jews -- then the 
 disciple has overcome, and achieved the next level of birth -- and to him, 
 there is nothing but Sabbaths. After the Celebration of the True Sabbath 
 which can only be accomplished in the fulfillment of the Laws within one's 
 self, there is no more counting of days, weeks, months and years -- i.e., 
 "But now after you have known God, or rather are known by God, how is it 
 that you turn again to the weak and beggarly elements, to which you desire 
 again to be in bondage? You observe days and months and seasons and years. I 
 am afraid for you, lest I have labored for you in vain" (Gal 4:9-11 NKJ). 
 The Pharisees, who were condemned because of their carnal and ritualistic 
 interpretation of the scriptures, celebrate an allegorical Sabbath that is 
 of the flesh -- i.e., what Paul portrays as a 
"shadow" of the True Sabbath 
 that is Spiritual. The Disciples of Jesus are to strive to bring about the 
 True Spiritual Sabbath of Completion -- and after you achieve this Spiritual 
 Sabbath, there is no more days of the week -- but only the abiding eternal 
 rest. And this is why the Sabbath is portrayed as following the Passover in 
 the Gospels, and the next day is portrayed as 
"one of the Sabbaths". Among 
 other things, what this means is that there is absolutely no basis for 
 observing the day of the sun-god -- i.e., Sunday -- except, of course, if 
 you worship the sun-god in the manner of the pagan Church of Rome. And the 
 fact that you can't count the days where the Son of Man was in the tomb 
 three days -- and make it the day of the sun-god -- simply because you read 
 the scriptures in the same manner as the Pharisees -- totally alienates the 
 believers of the Church from even the very objects and spiritual essence of 
 the teachings of Jesus and TheWay.
 
The scriptures were 
 intentionally composed so as to purposely inhibit readers from reading and 
 believing what is literally written in a linear interpretation. Herbert W. 
 Armstrong who was of course a literalist, proclaimed: There were no 
 eye-witnesses to the resurrection. Even so-called 
"apostolic fathers" had no 
 source of information save that record which is today available to us. 
 Tradition, then, must be dismissed (see The Resurrection Was Not On Sunday). 
 Yet, Armstrong was wrong -- i.e, (1) the allegorical account was composed in 
 this manner for an important reason; (2) and any seeker who prevails over 
 their physical organic limitations, learns the truth about the scriptures 
 and their allegorical nature and higher purpose. Therefore, if you want to 
 know the Truth, you will have to either (1) ask one of the authors of the 
 scriptures; (2) enter into Spirit and examine the actual historical record 
 that is not recorded in the allegorical scriptures; (3) or seek instruction 
 directly from the Indwelling Logos/Son of God/True Prophet (see 
http://OuterDarkness.Nazirene.org/#TrueProphet ).
 
While Armstrong from one 
 perspective had it right, the greater problem is seen in the fact that he 
 did not understand what the scriptures are presenting. While the scriptures 
 state that Jesus would be in the grave three days and three nights, only two 
 days are presented in the literal texts. Provoking both Armstrong and many 
 other Fundamentalist Christians to develop a great many dogmatic theories as 
 to why this contradiction in the scriptures exists. Armstrong writes: A 
 vital text proving that there were two Sabbaths in that week has been 
 obscured by almost every translation into English. Only Ferrar Fenton's 
 version has this point correct. Turn to Matthew 28:1. In the common versions 
 it says, "In the end of the Sabbath," or more correctly, "after the 
 Sabbath." Notice that both of these renderings use the singular -- Sabbath. 
 But in the original Greek the word is in the PLURAL. Fenton renders it 
 correctly by saying, "After the SABBATHS," although the remaining part of 
 the verse he has not translated quite correctly. In a foot-note to this 
 text, he says, "The Greek original is in the plural, 'Sabbaths'." When the 
 scriptures are properly understood within the context of the Greek term mia 
 ton sabbaton as stated at the subheading Spiritual Sabbath, the correct 
 understanding would be rendered for first day of the week as "one of the 
 Sabbaths".
In order to celebrate and 
 observe the Real Sabbath -- i.e., Spiritual Sabbath -- one must achieve the 
 Final Stage of Birth which would constitute a return to Eden from the 
 perspective of the fulfillment of the Laws and the reality of the Omega of 
 Creation within one's self And when the Ebionite Nazirenes (see 
http://Ebionite.com ) attested to the 
 fact that this is what the historical man Jesus accomplished within himself 
 -- it is this fulfilling the Spiritual Sabbath wthin himself that the 
 historical man Jesus accomplished. To begin: Herbert Armstrong did not at 
 all understand WHY the scriptures are an allegorical account -- simply 
 because the article An Inconvenient Truth ( 
http://AnInconvenientTruth.org ) 
 had not yet been written which explains the higher purpose and objective of 
 the scriptures. Mr. Armstrong had never known or spoken to the original 
 authors. He did not believe in the Inner Kingdom -- or the reality that when 
 the scriptures are used as the Key of Knowledge ( 
http://KeyOfKnowledge.org ) 
 and is turned within one's own mind and being, that mankind as the lost 
 prodigal son possesses the innate ability to enter and return to the Edenic 
 Kingdom of Origination while still physically alive in the body-vessel (see 
http://GateOfEden.com ). 
 Like the vast majority of Christians, Armstrong was robbed of the a more 
 spiritual understanding of the scriptures by virtue of the corruption of the 
 scriptures by the scribes of the Orthodox Church (see 
http://BibleCorruption.com ), 
 and the later directives of a series of Roman Emperors (see 
http://reincarnation.nazirene.org/#emperors ) 
 -- to the degree, that even those Words which were alleged to be spoken 
 directly from God to mankind, were corrupted and changed in order to promote 
 the Jesus-god of Pagan Rome.
 
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home