What Happened To Zacharias the son of Barachias, 
who was slain between the temple and the altar?
Is 
there proof that the Gospel of the Nazirenes (see
http://GospelOfTheNazirenes.org ) 
has preserved verses and teachings that were removed from the Gospels by the 
Church? 
The Missing Account Of Zacharias: 
At Matthew 23:34-35 Yeshua/Jesus says to the false religious leaders in that 
day: "Wherefore, behold, I send unto you 
prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; 
and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from 
city to city: That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the 
earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of 
Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar" (Mt 
23:35;Lk 11:51 NIV). Upon reading this we should ask who Zechariah was who was 
murdered between the temple and the alter?
If we 
pose a number of important simple questions: Who Zechariah was? Why were the 
secular Jews held accountable for his blood? And what does this account mean to 
us in our present time? Our severely edited Bibles which we rely upon today, 
cannot even begin to provide us with the answers to these and many other 
important questions. To demonstrate our inability to even remotely comprehend 
what Yeshua/Jesus is talking about while using our present-day copies of the New 
Testament which was severely altered by the Church of Rome, on this verse 
Barnes’ Notes writes: 
"It is not certainly known who this was. Some have thought that it was the 
Zecharias whose death is recorded in 2 Chr. 24:20-21. He is there called the son 
of Jehoiada; but it is known that it was common among the Jews to have two 
names, as Matthew is called Levi; Lebbeus, Thaddeus; and Simon, Cephas. Others 
have thought that Yeshua/Jesus referred to Zecharias the prophet, who might have 
been massacred by the Jews, though no account of his death is recorded. It might 
have been known by tradition."
We don’t 
know of whom Yeshua/Jesus speaks, because the whole account of Zacharias the 
prophet and the father of John the Baptist was removed from our Bibles. In the 
Nazirene Gospel 3:5-6 we read: "His father, 
Zacharias was filled with the Holy Spirit , and prophesied, Be blessed, Oh God 
of Israel , for you have visited and redeemed your people; and have raised up a 
symbol of power and strength for us, in the house of your servant David; as you 
spoke by the mouth of your holy prophets , who have been since the world began. 
You have spoken through the prophets so that we should be saved from our 
enemies, and from the hand of all those who hate us; You have spoken through the 
prophets in order to perform the mercy promised to our ancestors, and to 
remember Your holy covenant. The covenant! The oath which you swore to our 
father Abraham, that we, being granted deliverance from the hand of our enemies, 
might serve you without fear, in holiness and righteousness before you, all the 
days of our life. This child [John] 
will be called the prophet of 
the Most High; for He will stand before your face, Oh God, to prepare your ways; 
to give knowledge of salvation to your people by the remission of their sins. 
Through the tender mercy of you, Oh God, the day spring from on high has visited 
us, to give light to those who sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, to 
guide our feet into the way of peace. And the child grew, and his spirit 
intensified. His mission was hidden until the day of his presentation to Israel"
Spiritual holy men such as Zacharias, along with all other examples of Jews who 
were part of the Holy Nation of Israel, had to be removed from the text of the 
scriptures in order for the Gentile-Roman Church to rewrite history to make it 
appear that the Jews rejected Yeshua/Jesus, and the Gentiles became the new 
chosen people. Thus, in the same way that the above reference to Zacharias was 
removed, so also was that found in the Nazirene Gospel 5:13-19: 
"When they had departed, behold the angel of God 
appeared to Joseph in a dream , saying, Arise, and take the young child and His 
mother, and flee into Egypt. Remain there until I bring you word, for Herod will 
seek to destroy Him. And when Joseph arose, he took the young child and His 
mother by night, and went to Egypt, and was there for about seven years until 
the death of Herod The prophet, had spoken the word of God saying, Out of Egypt 
have I called my son. Elisabeth too, when she heard it, took her infant son and 
went up into a mountain and hid him. Herod sent his officers to Zacharias in the 
temple and said to him, Where is your child? Zacharias answered, I am a minister 
of God and am continually in the temple. I don't know where he is. And Herod 
demanded again, Truly, tell me where your son is? Don't you know that your life 
is in my hand? And Zacharias answered, The Lord is witness if you shed my blood. 
God will receive my spirit; for you will shed the blood of the innocent. And 
they slew Zacharias in the temple between the holy place and the altar; and the 
people knew it, for a voice was heard, Zacharias is slain, and his blood will 
not be washed out until the avenger comes. After a time the priests cast lots. 
The lot fell upon Simeon, and he filled Zacharias' place. Herod, when he saw 
that he was mocked by the wise men, was furious, and ordered to have all the 
children age two years and under, living in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts 
thereof, slain. He set the age of the children to be slain, according to the 
information asked of the wise men. Then were fulfilled the words spoken by 
Jeremiah the prophet, saying, In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and 
weeping, and great mourning, Rachel, weeping for her children, and would not be 
comforted, because they are not"
It is 
interesting to note that the Church Father Origen noted that the account of 
Zacharias had been removed from many of the biblical texts, and was only 
preserved in the uncanonical scriptures.   Thus, in a letter from Origen to 
Africanus, he writes concerning the removal of this important account (see
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0414.htm ):  
 
   | 
  
  "But probably to this you will 
  say, Why then is the "History" not in their Daniel, if, as you say, 
  their wise men hand down by tradition such stories? The answer is, that 
  they hid from the knowledge of the people as many of the passages which 
  contained any scandal against the elders, rulers, and judges, as they 
  could, some of which have been preserved in uncanonical writings 
  (Apocrypha)." 
  "Let us see now if in these 
  cases we are not forced to the conclusion, that while the Saviour gives 
  a true account of them, none of the Scriptures which could prove what He 
  tells are to be found." 
  "Then about 
  Zacharias the son of Barachias, who was slain between the temple and the 
  altar, we learn from Jesus only, not knowing it otherwise from any 
  Scripture. Wherefore I think no other supposition is possible, than that 
  they who had the reputation of wisdom, and the rulers and elders, took 
  away from the people every passage which might bring them into discredit 
  among the people. We need not wonder, then, if this history of the evil 
  device of the licentious elders...was concealed and removed from the 
  Scriptures by men themselves not very far removed from the counsel of 
  these elders." 
  "What I have said 
  is, I think, sufficient to prove that it would be nothing wonderful if 
  this history were true, and the licentious and cruel attack was actually 
  made...by those who were at that time elders, and written down by the 
  wisdom of the Spirit, but removed by these rulers of Sodom, as the 
  Spirit would call them." 
 | 
   | 
 
Thus, 
sincere Christians would look at this missing account of Zacharias -- the fact 
that it was noted to be removed in a letter by the Church Origen -- and the fact 
that it appears in the what is now called the Gospel of the Nazirenes -- and 
they would recognize that what they have been given is a sign from the Lord that 
they should question the integrity of their scriptures and doctrines of belief.  
Once we see the sections which were removed from our own Bibles that are still 
contained in the Nazirene Gospel, we can easily begin to understand what Yeshua/Jesus 
was making reference to with respect to the allegation that the secular Jews 
were guilty of the blood of Zacharias. What is clear is the fact that this 
revelation pertaining to Zacharias was once contained in our Bibles, but was 
purposely removed by the Gentile Church.  
    
     
    
    
    
    
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home