Brother Of Yeshua/Jesus

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Do Modern Church Mithraic-Christians Have Salvation?

The following is a reply to a letter asking why the Original followers of Jesus did not believe he was God-Incarnate:

Jesus taught that the Kingdom is within you (see The Fatal Error Of The Church ) -- which means that there are inner realities of mind and being that is not of this world.  With respect to the beginning of John: The interpretation of the word The Word, is from the Greek word Logos -- meaning, The Mind of God (see ).   And if you read the words of the Apostle Peter as preserved in the Homilies of his disciple Clement (see The True Prophet ), you will find that the Logos or Son of God that is portrayed as the True Prophet, is equally within the mind of all of mankind.   And, as documented in the earliest of Church writings, Jesus was a true holy man who fulfilled the Law within himself, and became the Anointed (Messiah/Christ) at his baptism.   Quoting from The Ebionite Nazirene Witness  
The witness of the disciples who personally knew Jesus, that he was a man who was Anointed (Messiah/Christ) by God -- but they changed the very words of God spoken to mankind -- i.e., "Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee".  What these original Ten Words spoken by the Father to mankind presented, was that the original EbioniteNazirene disciples of Jesus remained totally faithful to the Gospel teachings.   If, as the very words of God spoken to mankind stated, that Jesus became the Messiah (Anointed) and Son of God by living the necessary Consecrated Life that enabled him to fulfill the Law within himself, then the truth of the Gospel is found in the witness of the Ebionite who held firmly to the position that Jesus "...was justified by fulfilling the Law. He was the Christ of God, since not one of the rest of mankind had observed the Law completely. Had any one else fulfilled the commandments of the Law, he would have been the Christ, for they assert that our Lord Himself was a man in like sense with all humanity" (see Hippolytus,Refut. Omn. Haer. vii. 34).   When the Ebionite Nazirenes  make reference to the Law, this very much includes the Laws of Creation as portrayed in the words "...the designs/laws found throughout Nature and all of Creation".    That the historical man Jesus was a pattern for all of mankind because of his success in overcoming the Laws, is demonstrated in the words: "He was the Christ of God, since not one of the rest of mankind had observed the Law completely. Had any one else fulfilled the commandments of the Law, he would have been the Christ..."   And this confirms this statement with respect to the true potential of all of mankind that Jesus taught, as demonstrated in the words of Hippolytus when he wrote that they believed that when anyone "...thus fulfill the law, they are able to become Christs" (Hippolytus, Refut. Omn. Haer. vii. 34 - see ).   And this is why Jesus taught that he was our brother -- i.e., "Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am returning to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God'" (John 20:17 NIV).     
That the historical Jesus was a true holy man who became the Anointed (Messiah/Christ by fulfilling the Royal Law within himself, is attested to at Acts 2:22 where Jesus is portrayed as "a man, attested to you by God" -- and this was demonstrated by God performing "mighty works and wonders and signs that God did through him in your midst".   If Jesus was himself God incarnate as believed by the later Romans, then these words portraying Jesus as a man approved by God through the works and wonders that God did through him, never would have been presented in this manner.  
The heathen and pagan mind of the mainstream of Gentiles always had great difficulty in understanding the difference between the man Jesus, the Indwelling Logos/Son of God which is representative of the Mind of God (see The Logos), and the One Teacher which Jesus commanded all who would call themselves his disciples and followers, were to seek out and learn from (see The True Prophet).   And it was the living of the necessary Consecrated Life that Jesus ordained, and the seeking of the Kingdom within, that enabled the historical Jesus to become the Messiah, and At-One with the Indwelling Logos/Son of God.   And this is especially demonstrated in the words of Edward Gibbon with respect to the original position of the Ebionite Nazirene disciples of Jesus that he was in “...supernatural union of a man and God... In their eyes, Jesus of Nazareth was a mere mortal, the legitimate son of Joseph and Mary: but he was the best and wisest of the human race, selected as the worthy instrument to restore upon earth the worship of the true and supreme Deity. When he was baptized in the Jordan, the Christ, the first of the aeons, the Son of God himself, descended on Jesus in the form of a dove, to inhabit his mind, and direct his actions during the allotted period of his ministry” (Gibbon; The Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire, V.4, P.366). 
The original Gospels prior to the very Words of God that was spoken to mankind was corrupted by the Church of Constantine, confirmed the above when at his baptism in the Jordan the actual words spoken stated: "Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee".  That the spiritually degenerate leaders of the fourth century pagan Church of Rome could not comprehend the difference between being the Logos -- and fulfilling the Law to become At-One with the Logos -- thereby manifesting the Logos in the world by proxy -- does not mean that the spiritually degenerate pagans are correct.  

In the subheading entitled The Original Teachings Have Nothing In Common With Church Dogma , I demonstrate that the whole of modern Church dogma is totally based upon the faux-gnosticism of Mithraic and Manichaean sources -- supported by the removal of the most important spiritual teachings in the Gospels (see ).   And in view of the fact that Mithraic initiates were called Christians prior to the birth of my brother Jesus -- i.e., The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge confirms that the name Christian "originated outside of Christian and Jewish circles". The Mercer Dictionary of the Bible states that: "By the late first and early second centuries the name ‘Christian,’ which early believers avoided using of themselves, was beginning to be accepted". -- which means that you are a Mithraic-Christian who has virtually nothing in common with the original followers of Jesus or the original Gospel teachings of TheWay.   
The Mithraic-Christians believed that Jesus was the latest incarnation of the Mithra, the sun-god who was born on Dec. 25th and resurrected on Easter (Ishtar).  Mithraic (and Manichaean) teachings are based upon the doctrine of Original Sin -- which has no place in the Original Gospel Teachings (see The Folly Of Original Sin: ).  And as demonstrated in the above and on the links provided, the belief that Jesus was the latest incarnation in the Mithraic sun-god as taught by the Church of Rome which corrupted the scriptures to support their dogma, has virtually nothing in common with the Original Gospel Teachings of TheWay.   And since unlike you, I am not a Mithraic-Christian -- and having myself come to TheCall ( ) and have been taught directly by the Indwelling Logos (aka Son of God/True Prophet), I remain totally faithful to the Original Gospel Teachings of TheWay.   

You better pray that the belief in the Mithraic-Christ provides you the salvation you seek.   It appears to me that you have been seduced by the god of this world.


Post a Comment

<< Home