Brother Of Yeshua/Jesus

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Essential Christian Teachings Suppressed By The Church Of Constantine

In a recent gathering of the Ebionite Nazirene Spiritual Community, I made three videos that can be portrayed as the most important teachings that any Christian or believer from any religion can listen to and seriously consider.  Because the people were too carnal to comprehend the higher reality of the soul and the mysteries of the Kingdom, Jesus could only speak to the people in the enigma of allegorical parables -- i.e., "And with many such parables He spoke the word to them as they were able to hear it.  But without a parable He did not speak to them. And when they were alone, He explained all things to His disciples" (Mark 4:33-34 NKJV).   

Paul was limited to only being able to teach what he called "milk" intended for "babes in Christ" -- i.e.,  “And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual men, but as to men of flesh, as to babes in Christ” (1 Cor 3:1 NAS).  Explaining that “I gave you milk to drink, not solid food; for you were not yet able to receive it. Indeed, even now you are not yet able” (1 Cor 3:2 NAS).   Of the body of esoteric teachings that could only be revealed to Jesus' closet disciples which the Church of Constantine threw away and suppressed, the Apostle Peter wrote to James in the Epistle that if this body of spiritual teachings should become lost, that  " will remain even for those who really seek the truth, always to wander in error"

In order to restore the suppressed Spiritual Teachings I have published three videos that are ultra-important for every Christian and believer to listen to (see ).   These videos are named (1) The Counterfeit Doctrine of Reincarnation vs The Pre-existent Soul; (2) The Esoteric Sermon on the Mount - The Enigma Of The Segmented Mind; (3) and Spiritual Holographic Sex - The Esoteric Feminine Mystique

Jesus intended for his followers to be the most Enlightened people on the face of the earth -- but because the Gospels were corrupted (see ), and the very word that Father-God spoke to mankind was totally altered from their original context and meaning (see ), the congregations of faith-based believers only have these entry-level teachings which Paul portrayed as "milk .. for babes in Christ".    Being denied access to the higher spiritual teachings of Jesus, the modern Christian can no longer evolve into a more mature spiritual state of mind and being.  And thus, from a Gospel perspective, the restored teachings that are presented in these three videos are the most important for the sincere believer who desires to truly walk in TheWay with the Lord.  

Allan Cronshaw
aka Brother of Yeshua/Jesus

Sunday, July 05, 2015

Reply: Melbourne Mum Infuriated By Church's Sex Advice In School

I made the following reply to Nick Alexander who authored the article:  Melbourne mum infuriated by church's sex advice in school
Greetings Nick Alexander:

Your article  was sent to me by one of our Spiritual Congregation members, and I decided to write to you to present the facts -- facts that are not at all understood today.   Actually, I am quite surprised that a modern faith-based Church such as CityWide Pentecostal possess this knowledge with regard to the spiritual consequences of out of marriage sexual interaction.   Throughout history this level of knowledge was only possessed by Spiritually Enlightened groups.   

There is a reason why the Bible condemns fornication and adultery -- and not to understand that reason, is to become entrapped in a condition of spiritual ignorance.   While our modern culture has turned sexuality into a recreational sport, there is a deeper purpose for sex that goes far beyond pleasure and procreation.   And while much of this is explored beginning at the subheading of one of my articles entitled The Esoteric Feminine Mystique, the emerging scientific proof that supports what CityWide is stating can be found in the subheading of the same article entitled Why Sexual Immorality Is Condemned.   With respect to why the Bible rejects homosexuality, I have written a number of Blog articles which presents the facts (see Same-Sex Dilemma).  

If what Paul and the other Gospel Authors stated is true, and there exist higher realities and dimensions of being that are totally inconceivable to the mind of the undeveloped faith-based believer (see Mysteries Of The Gospel ) -- and by virtue of the immaturity of the faith-based believers brought about by an embryonic condition of mind which Paul portrayed as the "natural" mind of man -- and the limitations of this embryonic condition of mind even inhibited Jesus from conveying the true meaning of the scriptures, and the higher reality of the soul and the Kingdom to all but his inner core of disciples (see In The House - Taught In Parables) -- which means that the biblical authors were therefore powerless to explain in detail many of the most important Gospel teachings and concepts in the literal text of the New Testament -- then the spiritually mature author's of the scriptures who were themselves enlightened to these higher realities, remained virtually powerless to do anything more than to provide the people with a list of do's and don'ts -- so that the faith-based believers will be in a position where they will be better able to evolve to a mature understanding and comprehension of the teachings of Jesus and TheWay.   To totally ignore these do's and don'ts, without knowing the consequence of one's choices and actions, is paramount to walking out onto a freeway blindfolded. 

When rightly understood from a higher enlightened perspective, procreation must be understood as a by-product of sex (see The Merger Of Opposites Into One).  And anyone who asserts that two men or two women are synonymous with a genuine opposite-sex union, should try the experiment of wiring their house same-sex -- i.e., positive to positive, and negative to negative.   Guaranteed, they will very quickly begin to understand why the scriptures reject same-sex unions.   But, in view of the fact that man has, and must have, freewill -- even the right to squander away his opportunity of life -- if a person wants to engage in a what must be understood as little more than mutual-masturbation, that should of course be his choice.   But as stated in the article Should Christians Embrace Genuine Spiritual Marriage, Marriage is a Spiritual Sacrament -- and the vast majority of heterosexual couples dwell under the misconception that they are actually married in the true sense of the meaning.    And as demonstrated in the above article links, our culture has made it virtually impossible for men and women to even enter into a Spiritually Ordained Union and Marriage.   

As I stated, I am impressed that CityWide Pentecostal has members who even possess this essential knowledge of human sexuality that is only comprehended by the spiritually mature mind of the more serious followers of the teachings of Jesus and TheWay.   And they are doing the children a good service to make them aware that the child's actions have far-ranging consequences which they lack the maturity at present to comprehend.  In essence, this group of Pentecostals is attempting to warn the children that if they walk out into heavy traffic blind-folded, that there will be negative ramifications which will affect them for the rest of their lives.   And this is true.   And in presenting this fact to the immature minds of the students, they are making the children aware of the facts and realities which are being suppressed by our hedonist culture.   Its called informed choice -- i.e., removing the bind-fold before venturing out onto a freeway.   

GodSpeed in Theway,

Allan Cronshaw
PO Box 780
Graham, NC 27253

Sunday, June 28, 2015

Should Christians Embrace Genuine Spiritual Marriage? Civil Union vs Marriage

Can man redefine Spiritual Sacraments Ordained by God?  And when the Court crosses over the line of Separation of Church and State and attempts to redefine a Spiritual Sacrament and using secular authority to impose their will upon the Congregation of Believers, is this not a modern example of where Peter stated: But Peter and the apostles answered, "We must obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29).   

For those who believe that Marriage is a Spiritual Sacrament and Covenant that can't be redefined by man, the recent ruling of the Supreme Court has tested the faithfulness to your beliefs.   If it is true that Marriage is a Spiritual Sacrament and Covenant between God, a man and his wife, then the government has betrayed your trust.     In the words of Jesus: "But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and join to his wife; And they two shall be one flesh: so then they are no more two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no one separate" (Mark 10:6-9).  A marriage, therefore, is that sacrament and holy consecrated union that make the man and woman, "one flesh".   And that few Christians today even understand the spiritual potential of Marriage, is explored in the article The Divine Role Of Woman.

Throughout my writings on the Sacrament of the Divine Marriage, I have long maintained that neither a secular or religious authority has the power to institute a Genuine Marriage that is Ordained by God -- that marriages are determined by the content and faithfulness of the heart and mind -- without which, no Real Marriage can be instituted.   Further, not only does the Sacrament of Marriage have requirements to be entered into, but must be maintained in accord with Spiritual Standards.   In view of the fact that the Court has moved to redefine the Sacrament of Marriage, what they have accomplished is nothing more than state licensed co-habitation and sex.   And this does not in any manner constitute a marriage in the Eyes of God.

We have all seen the videos where both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have pledged their belief in marriage as a sacred union between one man and one woman.   It has been asserted that in the case of Barack Obama, he lied to get elected -- and in the words of the late William Safire, Hillary Clinton is a "congenital liar".    Clinton will be shocked when it is revealed to her when she passes from this life, that her and Bill Clinton are not even married in the Eyes of God.   As a Sacred Covenant, if the terms of that Covenant are not maintained in purity of thought and body, then the Covenant itself is nullified and void. 

From the perspective that secular authority which does not even possess the power to institute a True Marriage, and has moved to redefine a Spiritual Sacrament that they have no business of setting the terms and conditions of, the people of the states should immediately move to negate the power of secular authority to institute what they cannot institute -- and thereby enacting the necessary laws and statutes to deny secular authority the right to use the term marriage -- replacing it instead with the term "civil union".   The terms of marriage must be taken away from civil authorities, and returned solely to the domain of religion.   Therefore, all such unions ordained by the state and secular authorities, must be labeled "civil unions" -- with all secular authorities banned from even using the term marriage.

All people should have equal Constitutional Rights and Protections -- and therefore if a same-sex couple desire to enter into a legal union ordained by the state, this union should properly be named a "civil union".  Same-sex couples are just the beginning, and this will in the future again be redefined to cover polygamy, polyandry, and eventually the union of beast and man.    In Islam, a man can have -- and are encouraged to have -- as many as four (4) wives, plus concubines.   And it is only a matter of time before the Court moves to affirm the right of the Muslim to practice their religion.   Therefore, in view of the fact that the authorities of the state do not have the (spiritual) power to make the two (man and woman) "one flesh", they must be denied the use of that word -- which means that all state sanctified unions would be defined as "civil unions".   If the perspective partners are members of a religious group that promotes the sanctity and fidelity of entering into the Sacrament and Covenant of Marriage, then it would be within the domain of the religious group to issue a Marriage Certificate (see previous articles on Marriage at LINK).    In view of the fact that the the Constitution requires separation of church and state -- and the state does not have the power to either redefine or initiate the Spiritual Sacrament of Marriage -- the People must themselves move to deny the authorities of the state even the use of the term Marriage -- replacing it with the more proper term, civil union. 

The scriptures are allegorical -- and when the spiritual meaning of the Genesis account of Creation is understood, what is revealed is the Forces and Laws of Consciousness that is operating within the mind of mankind.  In the article on The Tree Of Life And The Divine Marriage, it is demonstrated that the fruit of the Tree of Duality (aka Tree of Good and Evil) is the divided thoughts and impressions of man and woman.   And the need to merge the male and female impressions in a higher Morphic Field which creates a spiritual atmosphere and environment for the mind and being to evolve and spiritually mature, is presented to the seeker in the Gospel of Thomas saying: They said to him, "Shall we then, as children, enter the kingdom?" Jesus said to them, "When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female; ...then will you enter the kingdom."   Unless this teaching that was removed from the Gospels used by Christians today is fulfilled with respect to the the eating of the fruit of the Tree of Life through the merging of the male and female columns of the Tree of Duality within the seeker, then it will remain impossible to gain entrance into the Inner Kingdom.   And those people who reject same-sex unions, innately know this to be true.

From the perspective of a civil union, people have the absolute right to enter into any union of their choosing -- and no one has the right to force them to do differently.   Ultimately, our Constitution provides each man and woman the right to live in accord with any philosophy or mindset of their choosing -- to the degree that they have the right to squander away their opportunity of life.   Sex, and sexual expression, is not a sin, so long as it is not coerced or forced upon another individual.   But when used properly within the construct and environment of The Tree Of Life And The Divine Marriage, sexual interaction between the opposite polarities of male and female is the catalyst that initiates higher development of mind and being on the "narrow way" of Enlightenment and Anointing.     And no secular authority has the power to initiate and ordain a True Spiritual Marriage.   Secular authorities are limited to licensing sex and cohabitation only -- and because of this fact, the unions they license should be righly  limited to civil-unions. 

Allan Cronshaw
aka Brother of Yeshua/Jesus 

Friday, June 19, 2015

Pope Francis - Talk The Talk Without Walking The Walk?

While it is great that Pope Francis is so concerned with the issue of man-made climate change, but after reviewing the 10 Key Points of his Encyclical (see Washington Times Article), there is not a single word of how Pope Francis is going to walk the walk and set an example for all Catholics to follow.   St. Francis of course is said to have stated: Preach the Gospel, but only if you must, use words -- and if Pope Francis is worthy of his namesake, he should do the same.  Quoting some facts which I presented in a previous article on Global Warming
The following are a few inconvenient truths that the former V.P. ignores:
  • A major United Nations study determined that the meat industry generates 40 percent more greenhouse-gas emissions than all the cars, trucks, SUVs, ships, and planes in the world combined.
  • Researchers at the University of Chicago concluded that going vegan is 50 percent more effective in combating the climate crisis than switching to a hybrid car.
  • The official handbook of the Live Earth concerts that Gore helped organize acknowledges that not eating meat is "the single most effective thing" you can do to reduce your climate change impact (emphasis in original).
If Pope Francis was to renounce the eating of flesh as did the original Ebionite Disciples of Jesus (see ) -- and set the example for all Christians -- the threat of Global Warming and Climate Change would be totally eliminated.  Further, if the grain that was used to feed the animals in the meat industry was used instead to feed the people, world hunger would be totally eliminated. 

Becoming a vegetarian and living the spiritual life would have even greater benefits than what Pope Francis could even imagine.  In purifying the physical body and living the Consecrated Life in the manner of Jesus' original disciples, it is likely that Pope Francis would begin to recall the previous lives his soul has lived (see ).   Recently, when a little girl asked Pope Francis why there was evil in the world (see The UnAnswerable Question?), the pope was unable to answer this child's question -- a question the answer to which, is of far greater importance than Climate Change.   If people actually knew and understood the reason why there is evil in the world, they would be forced to reconsider their relationships with their brothers and sisters -- and would be forced to more closely examine the manner in which they treated others.  In fact, if more Christians were aware of the original teachings that were suppressed by the Church (see ), the vision of the pope of a more spiritual world could become a reality.

Perhaps the Hand of God has moved the pope to support Climate Change, in order to open the door for more Christians to live the original Consecrated Life in TheWay, which would not only have the effect of a cleaner and more spiritual planet, but would draw them closer to God.  

Brother of Yeshua/Jesus

Sunday, April 19, 2015

Why Are Some People Born Homosexual? Why Is Homosexuality Rejected In The Bible?

Why are some people born homosexual?   Why is homosexuality rejected in the Bible?  These are crucial questions that modern Christian clergy find themselves in the position of making policy, without understanding the wisdom of the scriptures on the subject of homosexuality.   Because the Church corrupted the scriptures in order to make them support the doctrines of pagan Rome, modern Christians have been deprived of the necessary understanding to comprehend why some people are born homosexual (see  And thus, modern clergy now find themselves in the unenviable position of making Church policy without understanding why the Bible rejects homosexuality. 

In response to a recent Washington Post article by Sarah Pulliam Bailey entitled How Rachel Held Evans became the most polarizing woman in evangelicalism, I sent the following email to Sarah Bailey:

Greetings Sarah:

Your article in the Washington Post on Rachel Held Evans (LINK) was brought to my attention.   There is no email address for RHE, and if you have one I would appreciate you forwarding this to her.  With respect to the LGBT community within the Church, the paramount question has not yet been asked -- i.e., why is a person born homosexual?   Quoting from my own article on the website , under the subheading The Fourth Fatal Mistake Of The Church
If what Paul and the other Gospel Authors stated is true, and there exist higher realities and dimensions of being that are totally inconceivable to the mind of the undeveloped faith-based believer (see Mysteries Of The Gospel ) -- and by virtue of the immaturity of the faith-based believers brought about by an embryonic condition of mind which Paul portrayed as the "natural" mind of man -- and the limitations of this embryonic condition of mind even inhibited Jesus from conveying the true meaning of the scriptures, and the higher reality of the soul and the Kingdom to all but his inner core of disciples (see In The House - Taught In Parables) -- which means that the biblical authors were therefore powerless to explain in detail many of the most important Gospel teachings and concepts in the literal text of the New Testament -- then the spiritually mature author's of the scriptures who were themselves enlightened to these higher realities, remained virtually powerless to do anything more than to provide the people with a list of do's and don'ts -- so that the faith-based believers will be in a position where they will be better able to evolve to a mature understanding and comprehension of the teachings of Jesus and TheWay.   To totally ignore these do's and don'ts, without knowing the consequence of one's choices and actions, is paramount to walking out onto a freeway blindfolded. 

Before becoming institutionalized under Pagan Rome, the Church possessed a core-body of esoteric knowledge that explained and revealed all the enigmas that baffle the modern faith-based Christian.   But this body of knowledge was thrown way, and even outlawed by the emperors and priests who ruled over the Church.   From a man's perspective, women are both essential, and are not replaceable, and neither can two women spiritually replace a man.   There is an important reason why same-sex unions would be rejected in the scriptures and by the early Church.   And there is a higher spiritual purpose and reason for sex between a man and woman that is not at all understood today -- and this reason goes far beyond the idea that sex is for procreation.   If you would like to research this subject that is no longer understood today, you can begin to read at the subheading The Esoteric Feminine Mystique.   There is also a much shorter two part Blog article entitled The Tree Of Life And The Divine Marriage PART I, and PART II

If you have any questions with respect to the above, and reasons behind the do's and don'ts that remain ignored and not at all understood by the modern Church, I will gladly answer any question you have,  And if you would rather a phone conversation with myself (and my wife), I would be glad to be of assistance to you.  

GodSpeed in TheWay,

Allan Cronshaw

Modern man has been deprived of the essential knowledge to understand the spiritual reality of sex between a man and woman and the dynamic interaction of opposites.   But there is a simple experiment that would demonstrate the biological and spiritual factors that are presented in the above noted subheading entitled  The Esoteric Feminine Mystique.   In the same way that man and woman within the spectrum of the Divine Pattern of Creation are of an opposite polarity, so too is all aspects of Creation holographically imbued with these same opposite polarities.   Therefore, to begin to understand why, we should rewire our colleges and universities same-sex -- i.e., instead of being wired positive and negative, we should wire some buildings positive to positive, and other buildings negative to negative.   The lesson learned would be invaluable. 

In the separation of  Church and State, it must be recognized that the concept of sex as a sacrament between a committed husband and wife under the coverture of marriage, came into being through religion.   Which means that when government attempts to redefine the institution of marriage, they are in fact redefining a spiritual sacrament.   And while government has a compelling interest in promoting a civil union -- and said civil union can constitute whatever conditions are appropriate for the people involved -- government does not have the right to redefine a spiritual sacrament.   Therefore, in the upcoming ruling of the US Supreme Court, a wise decision would be to limit all government ordained unions -- even that of man and woman -- to a civil union.   As this would bring equality, while baring government from forcing religion to accept a secular-defined sacrament.   

Even more important, though, would be for clergy to read the above noted articles and gain an understanding of why the Bible rejects fornication, adultery, and same-sex unions.   Without the positive dynamics of an opposite polarity committed marriage, we are confusing the God-Ordained sacrament of sexual interaction between Husband and Wife in a Divine Marriage, with various forums of mutual masturbation.    And while everyone has the perfect right to express themselves sexually in any manner that pleases them -- so long as they don't forcefully impose themselves on the rights and freedoms of others -- there is a vast difference between the Sacrament of Sex in a Divinely Ordained Marriage, and the act of mutual masturbation which is commonly practiced in our cultural civil unions -- and this is true with respect to both same-sex, and opposite-sex unions

Monday, March 30, 2015

Has North Carolina Outlawed The Original Teachings of Jesus?

Is there a guarantee of First Amendment Religious Rights for the most religious and spiritual of believers and seekers?   Or, is freedom of religion only guaranteed for the entry-level mainstream of Christians whose tenets of belief do not require a great amount of dedication and commitment?   This is the question that has been set before the North Carolina Legislature.   And when rightly understood, the question that is being asked is whether there are Constitutional protections ONLY for faith-based religion that has no real requirements, and do these same Constitutional protections also apply to the original teachings of Jesus and TheWay that has many personal requirements?  
There are numerous Gospel teachings and commandments that are often overlooked -- except by the most Spiritually Mature who arrive at their level of Being, by understanding and putting these essential overlooked concepts and commandments into the daily practice of their lives.   To be in the world and not of it, one must maintain a very high degree of separation from the thinking, mindset and lifestyle of those who live carnal and cultural lives in accord with the thinking and ways of this world.   With respect to the actions of the original disciples as presented in the Book of Acts, the spiritual communities were to be set apart from the culture and people of this world to the degree that Paul commanded the Christians to have nothing to do with those who were portrayed as being spiritually or morally unclean -- i.e., "Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you" (2 Cor 6:17 KJV).   To the degree that Paul commanded the community of believers not even to dine with sinners -- i.e., "I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people... But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner -- not even to eat with such a person..." (1 Cor 5:9-13 NKJ).   
What causes the great variance in religious beliefs and lifestyle-practices?  Why does one person claim a religious exemption from such things as inoculations, while others of the same religious faith have no problem being vaccinated?   Is there a question of right or wrong?   Or, is each person's perceptive vision of both their religion and life in accord with their own level of spiritual awareness and manifest being?   In accord with the level of the rungs on the proverbial Jacob's Ladder of spiritual attainment and sanctification, it is true that more spiritually mature Christians perceive and understand at a much higher level than their entry-level counterparts.   And in view of the fact that the spiritual requirements for each level of attainment are different -- then it is important to understand the cause of these vast differences that often separates and creates walls of division within the same sect of believers and adherents.   But even more important is the fact that while the entry-level of basic faith-based believer has very little in the way of requirements, it is the more advanced spiritually mature Christian who must be discerning and set apart from the cultural mainstream -- i.e., "to whom much has been given, much more will be expected"

Our society is not accustomed to thinking of levels of knowledge, awareness and attainment within the body of Christians.   It is important to understand the reality presented in the Gospels when Jesus spoke to the multitudes in parables -- a system of allegories designed to conceal the inner meaning from the multitude of hearers, while permitting only a select group to understand the esoteric truths that were being revealed (see Mystery Of The Gospel).   And in explanation of  this process of teaching and revealing in accord with the level of spiritual maturity, the disciples of Jesus asked him why he spoke in enigmatic parables, and did not speak plainly to the people?   Jesus said of his disciples: “The secret of the kingdom of God has been given to you. But to those on the outside everything is said in parables so that, they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding” (Mark 4:11-12 NIV).   That the word translated secret, is the same word translated mystery, and makes reference to a body of esoteric knowledge that is beyond man's organic "natural" comprehension, is a reality that few modern believers or the critics of religion have been able to come to terms with (see An Inconvenient Truth).   In explanation of the previous words of Jesus, the Wycliffe Bible Commentary writes that: “…the initiate was instructed in the esoteric teaching... which was not revealed to outsiders… The mystery of the kingdom in its ultimate development is the full-orbed message of the Gospel (Rom 16:25-26). The purpose of parables was to instruct the initiates without revealing the items of instruction to the ones who were without. This is in keeping with the Biblical principle that spiritual understanding is restricted to those who have become spiritual...”

The key teaching and concept in the above is the reality expressed in the teaching that "...the Biblical principle that spiritual understanding is restricted to those who have become spiritual...”.  Which provokes the question: How does one become spiritual?   In the parable of TheCall to the Wedding Feast, those who had not put on the required Wedding Garment of Spiritual Purity, were thrown out into the "outer darkness" of mind and being -- i.e., "Then the king said to the attendants, ‘Bind him hand and foot and cast him into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth’" (Mt 22:13) -- "I say to you that many will come from east and west, and recline at the table with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven; but the sons of the kingdom will be cast out into the outer darkness; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth" (Mt 8:11-12) -- "For to everyone who has, more shall be given, and he will have an abundance; but from the one who does not have, even what he does have shall be taken away. Throw out the worthless slave into the outer darkness; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth" (Mt 25:29-30). 

 The original teachings of Jesus known as TheWay, was a system that enabled the lost prodigal sons who dwell in the "outer darkness" of this world -- i.e., portrayed as the Far Country -- to return to the Edenic Kingdom of our Heavenly Father -- the "narrow gate" entrance point, being within us (see ).   But to accomplish this, the seeker/disciple must evolve to a condition of spiritual maturity -- putting on what was portrayed as the required "wedding garment" of purity (see ) -- while seeking the Kingdom within.   The problem which arose is the Church became institutionalized under Pagan Rome -- and became the victim of secularization.   The series of emperors who ruled over the Church, suppressed the original spiritual teachings, and hunted down the more Spiritual Christians and murdered whoever refused to accept the religion of the emperor.  

In our present time the original spiritual teachings of Jesus are being re-established and the viability of the Church is once again moving in a more spiritual direction.   With the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls and many of the early suppressed Christian scriptures, the true spiritual foundation of the Church is once again being re-established.   More and more Christians are seeking spiritual maturity and the Kingdom within.   But to accomplish this transformation of the self, the Christian seeking spiritual maturity must purify the body as the Living Temple (see Temple), as they seek the next stage of birth that bestows upon them entrance into the Kingdom while still physically alive in the body-vessel.    And thus, the commandment set forth by Paul "Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you"   

The requirement of the Christian seeking Spiritual Maturity is to be in the world and not of it.    The Spiritual Christian lives in accord with biblical standards -- rejects the carnal-driven culture within which our society is presently immersed -- Spiritual Christians seek to become the "good ground" within which the Living Seed has been implanted (see Good Ground) -- like Daniel, rejects the diet of our society (see The End Times) -- and only puts substances that are pure and natural in their bodies.   

In the spiritual abstract entitled Inoculations - From A Christian Biblical Perspective -- I demonstrate that in addition to defiling the body-vessel, inoculations act as a catalyst for thoughts and impressions to bombard and ground the child to our earth-bound hedonist culture.   I demonstrate that as Christians become more spiritually mature, that they begin to receive the impressions from the Indwelling Logos/Son of God -- and it is these impressions that convey to them to purify their body-vessel, and to reject such things as inoculations and permitting their children to become immersed in the cultural thinking and lifestyle of this world.   And while as a Conservative Red State, North Carolina provided the necessary environment for this Spiritual Growth and Maturity to be brought about in the lives of many Christians, the North Carolina legislature is attempting to change the laws that would make it more difficult for this spiritual growth and development to be brought about.   And while one would expect this from an over-secularized blue state that denies the people their individual God-Given Rights, the very fact that the North Carolina legislature is even considering the denial of individual rights, causes many to question the differences between the two political parties.   

The present influx of many communicable diseases can better be attributed to those coming over the southern border of the United States with virtually every disease known to man, than to those who hold personal religious convictions against the inoculation of their children.    The fact that our government is needlessly exposing the American people to every variety of exotic diseases, is part of the insanity of what I portray as the Black Plague of the Mind (see The Morphic Field - Public School - Inoculations As A Catalyst).    

On the website Inoculations - From A Christian Biblical Perspective there is a letter from and in reply to Sen. Terry Van Duyn with respect to the North Carolina Legislatures attempt to force the parents of those who hold a sincere religious conviction to inoculate their children -- thereby eliminating their First Amendment Religious Rights.   And as stated throughout the article, the result of this legislative action will gravely effect the development of all religious groups throughout the state.        

Allan Cronshaw
aka Brother of Yeshua/Jesus  

Sunday, January 18, 2015

Tucker Carlson - Pope Francis - The UnAnswerable Question?

This morning on Fox And Friends Weekend, host Tucker Carlson while covering Pope Francis, made the profound statement with respect to the pope's inability to answer the question presented to him by a young child on why bad things happen to good people, that he (Carlson) considered this question unanswerable.    As a conservative journalist, the inability of Pope Francis to answer this question should be close to Tucker Carlson's heart -- i.e., why can't the pope correctly answer the question this young child posed to him?   The answer is because of the damaging effect of Big Government upon the teachings of the Church.

Jesus, as well as his disciples and early followers could have easily answered this child's question as to why bad things happen to good people.   Which provokes the question: Is the doctrines of the modern Church the same as the original teachings of Jesus which was known as TheWay?   Sadly, they are not!!!   And the divergence of teachings are directly the result of the changes brought about when secular-imposed dogma was forced upon the Church.   And Pope Francis' inability to answer the question of this young child, is caused by the very Big Government agenda that Tucker Carlson has made it his career to oppose.   Which provokes the question: To what degree does Pope Francis preach the teachings of Jesus?   Or the religion of a series of Roman Emperors who with the power of the sword, forced their dogma upon the Church?   Tucker Carlson can research the answer to this question at the link, The Religion Of Roman Emperors.   And further down in the same article, Tucker can explore the original teachings of Jesus as to Why Bad Things Happen To Good People?  

While I would be glad to answer any question that Tucker Carlson has pertaining to the above Big Government takeover of the Church which has inhibited Pope Francis from being able to answer this crucial and ultra-important question.  Other than tweeting him -- which I am in the process of doing -- I don't see any way of communicating directly with him.   And while I would welcome the opportunity to answer the questions of Pope Francis, I don't see any way to communicate directly with him, either. 

Allan Cronshaw
aka Jacob, Brother of Yeshua/Jesus