Brother Of Yeshua/Jesus

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

Reincarnation - The Key To Christianity

Reincarnation -- The Key To Christianity -- the removal of which makes it impossible for the modern Christian to learn from the indwelling Logos -- and to comprehend the Spiritual meaning of the scriptures. 

At the below subject links, I demonstrate that the Christian world is still functioning from an Old Covenant mode and mindset that has flat-lined their mental and spiritual development. I explore the teaching on the Logos/Son of God/True Prophet that MUST be their only Teacher in order to be a follower of Jesus. And I demonstrate why it is impossible for Christians to receive the Divine Manna of the Kingdom from the True Prophet. I restore the teachings on the "child" that the Church removed from the Gospels, and explain why the Christian world has banished themselves in a spiritual diaspora of abject ignorance where they remain shackled by the Citizen of the Far Country.   The Church removed and suppressed the teaching on the child that each follower of Jesus must become to gain entrance into the Kingdom.  Once the teaching on the children is restored, it is impossible to become a child by merely calling upon the name of Jesus as one's personal lord and savior.   But because the foundational paradigm of the modern Church had been built upon a gravely flawed man-made doctrine  -- a doctrine that ignored and suppressed the teaching on the children which they removed from the canonical gospels -- the modern Christian can't be taught by the indwelling Logos/Son of God/True Prophet -- and it remains impossible for faith-based believers to function in a New Covenant mode and spiritual environment.  

I have added the below links to the article on the Key of Knowledge which because they are equally functioning in an Old Covenant Mode by throwing away the Key of Knowledge, the condemnation of the religious leaders who are portrayed as "blind guides", is even more relevant of the clergy in the Christian Church, than it was with respect to the Pharisees.   The facts that are presented in the below links if put into action, will restore the Church as the Light of the World.  Jesus portrayed the plight of the corrupted Church in the words: "Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men" (Matt 5:13).   When the Church removed the teaching on the pre-existent soul that evolves to Wholeness and Completion over the course of many lifetimes, they made the Church apostates to the Truth and the Kingdom.

The Two Ways - New vs Old Covenants
The True Prophet
Christians Blocked From Being Taught By Indwelling Logos
Turn About And Become As a Child

Friday, January 11, 2019

The Christian Rejection Of The New Covenant

When the Key of Knowledge ( ) is applied to the scriptures, such biblical figures as Mary Magdalene are not the personification of an historical person -- but rather, the purification, development and raising up of the (feminine) intuitive aspects of the disciples own mind.    Why is the (feminine) Intuitive spheres of mind important?  In the Gospels associated with the allegorical portrayal of Mary Magdalene it is written: “She speaks to the other disciples about Jesus and what she’s seen, and Peter says, ‘I don’t believe the Lord said these things. These are certainly strange ideas.’ And she says, ‘Well, do you think I made them up? Do you think I’m lying about the Lord?’ ”   In this allegorical representation, the linear-rational aspect of mind is represented in Peter's inability to comprehend what the feminine-intuitive as represented in the allegorical personification of Mary Magdalene reveals.   And since these intuitive visions, impressions and wisdom does not support the linear reasoning of the masculine vision of this world and Creation, in most people they are rejected. 
In the introduction to the book Secrets of Mary Magdalene, Prof. Elaine Pageles writes and quotes the Gospel of Philip: Simultaneously, the Gospel of Philip celebrates Mary Magdalene as manifesting the divine spirit, which this gospel calls the “virgin who came down” from heaven. When Christians spoke of Jesus “born from a virgin,” this author agrees—but refuses to take it literally. So some people, he says, take this literally to mean that Jesus’ mother became pregnant apart from any man, apart from sexual intercourse. But this, he says, is the “faith of fools” who fail to comprehend spiritual matters (although, as we note, it can be seen in the birth narratives offered in the New Testament gospels of Matthew and Luke). Instead, continues the Gospel of Philip, Jesus was born physically, just as all humans, as the son of biological parents. The difference, says the author of this gospel, that he was also “born again” in baptism--born spiritually to become the son of the Father above, and of the heavenly Mother, the Holy Spirit.   That one of the primary objectives of this life is to bring about and achieve the next stage of birth -- a non-physical birth which is allegorically portrayed as a Virgin Birth -- should be of primary importance to all people.    As stated in the Gospel of Philip: "Those who say that first they shall die and (then) they shall arise are confused. If they do not first receive the resurrection (while) they live, they will not receive anything (when) they die".    Therefore, it is impossible to fulfill the requirements of the Gospels without first fulfilling the teaching of Jesus when he stated: "When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female; ...then will you enter the kingdom." (see The Gospel Enigma That Modern Christians Can't Comprehend ). 
With the Key of Knowledge applied to the Gospels, in the same way that Peter as representing the outward looking  (male) linear-rational spheres of mind states of the intuitive visions and wisdom of Mary Magdalene:  "...These are certainly strange ideas", it is a fact that it is the lopsided development of what Einstein portrayed as the linear-rational servant that inhibits the development of the intuitive-gift -- i.e., as seen in Einstein's statement that "The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift."    And what the Enlightened Visionary has warned is that because man's religious, philosophical, cultural and educational institutions "...have created a society that honors the [rational] servant and has forgotten [and suppressed the development of] the [intuitive] gift".  To the degree that both reading the scriptures in a linear manner, as well as our education continues to suppress the intuitive spheres of mind, the wisdom of Einstein is presented in his analysis that: “The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.”     Without the balanced development of the intuitive, the linear-rational which only senses outwardly, arrives as a point where it becomes what can be portrayed as flat-lined -- which in turn inhibits the further development of the linear rational servant from itself maturing beyond organic limitations.   It is the inherent nature of the (male) linear to rule the roost -- both in the outer world and the inner.   And in the say way that some male-dominated cultures require a woman to be cloaked in the burka, the male-linear spheres of mind always strive to override the feminine-intuitive spheres of mind (see ), totally inhibiting the inward looking feminine-intuitive spheres of mind -- causing the intuitive to be atrophied and suppressed in a type of mental-burka.   And herein lies the great obstacle to human development that linear-intellectuals don't at all understand -- i.e., the reality that the linear programming of the mind which is the agenda of our Fundamentalist religions and traditional educational systems -- including the reading of books and traditional study -- only serves to inhibit the development of the intuitive spheres of mind -- and it is the lack of balance between the inward looking intuitive and the outward looking linear-rational that inhibits the development of the mind beyond a certain very shallow organic physical level of maturity.    When Paul warned that the Christians who he personally taught were incapable of comprehending the spiritual meaning of the Gospel (see Animal-Soul ), it was because of the lack of development of the inward-looking feminine-intuitive spheres of mind.   Further, what we are presented with are a number of paradoxes that have confronted man since he first stepped foot on the earth.   Thus, these proverbial questions must be confronted: Is the mind of a child empty?   Or, does a great source of knowledge already exist within the mind of the child that must be tapped into?   Do you instruct a child through rote programming in the manner of our educational systems today?   Or do you guide the child into an environment of self-discovery?  The very foundation of the New Covenant is to mature the mind of the seeker where they can begin to learn from directly from the Indwelling Logos (aka Son of God & True Prophet). 

Monday, December 31, 2018

At-Onement With The Logos/Son Of God

At-Onement With The Logos/Son Of God:
Because our modern culture does not understand what would be portrayed as a Coverture Marriage Union, they can't understand the impact of the corruption of the words of the Gospel where God spoke directly to mankind (see The Corruption Of The Words Of God ), and what it means to be At-One with the Logos/Son of God.  Quoting from At-Onement With The Logos/Son Of God :

At-Onement With The Logos/Son Of God: What does it mean to be At-One with the Logos/Son of God?  In the parable of TheCall (see ), the believer/disciple must prepare themselves to come to the Wedding Feast.  In the parable of the Ten Virgins, the believer/disciple is portrayed as a virgin who must enter the bridal chamber with the Bridegroom (Logos/Son of God -- i.e., "The virgins who were ready went in with him to the wedding banquet. And the door was shut" (Matt 25:10).  The portrayal of a virgin is that of purity and undefiled by this world.  Where the Church Authority Hippolytus above portrays Jesus becoming the Anointed (Messiah/Christ) by fulfilling the Law, the relationship of a Holy Man who can be portrayed as s Spiritual Virgin who fulfills the Law within his own Mind and Being was noted by Gibbon who wrote that Jesus was portrayed by his direct followers as being in “....supernatural union of a man and God... In their eyes, Jesus of Nazareth was a mere mortal, the legitimate son of Joseph and Mary: but he was the best and wisest of the human race, selected as the worthy instrument to restore upon earth the worship of the true and supreme Deity. When he was baptized in the Jordan, the Christ, the first of the aeons, the Son of God himself, descended on Jesus in the form of a dove, to inhabit his mind, and direct his actions during the allotted period of his ministry” (Gibbon; The Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire, V.4, P.366).   Thus, when the Holy and Anointed man Jesus became At-One with the Indwelling Logos/Son of God, he entered what in Natural Law was understood to be a Coverture, which is the concept that woman was an integral part of the man as seen and demonstrated in our laws that predated our so-called modern times.  In Blackstone's Law Commentary, under the Common Law, Book II, Chapter XXIX, VI, marriage is described as the absolute merger of husband and wife into a single legal identity: “…By marriage, the husband and wife are one person in law... The very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated and consolidated into that of the husband, under whose wing, protection, and cover she performs everything; and is therefore called… a femme-covert; and her condition during her marriage is called her coverture”.  In Law, the concept of the unity of husband and wife as a single person was so complete, that a married woman was even absolved of full criminal responsibility for her own conduct: “…criminal acts committed by a woman in her husband's presence were assumed to be done under the husband's command, and he was therefore held responsible” (The Law of Domestic Relations by Homer Clark, St. Paul, Minn, West Publishing Co., 1968, p. 229). As U.S. Supreme Court Justice Black observed: “…this rule has worked out in reality to mean that though the husband and wife are one, the one is the husband” (Law, Society, and Industrial Justice by Philip Selznick, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969, p. 53).  And it is this Coverture relationship that is portrayed in the 22nd saying of the Gospel of Thomas when the disciples asked about how the Kingdom is to be entered: Jesus said to them, "When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female; ...then will you enter the kingdom."
By fulfilling the Law and restoring the duality of Adam and Eve and the Tree of Duality within himself (see The Restoral Of Adam And Eve ), the man Jesus who had achieved the purity of what can be portrayed as a Spiritual Virgin, became Anointed (Messiah/Christ), and was able to enter into a Coverture Marriage with the Logos/Son of God -- as seen in the above words of Gibbon:  "...When he was baptized in the Jordan, the Christ, the first of the aeons, the Son of God himself, descended on Jesus in the form of a dove, to inhabit his mind, and direct his actions during the allotted period of his ministry”  And the relationship of the man Jesus who entered into a Coverture Marriage with the Logos/Son of God, is therefore portrayed in the above words: “…By marriage (At-Onement), the husband and wife are one person in law... The very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated and consolidated into that of the husband, under whose wing, protection, and cover she performs everything; and is therefore called… a femme-covert; and her condition during her marriage is called her coverture”.  And it is this same invitation that is extended to all of mankind in the parable of TheCall to the Wedding Feast (see ).   Therefore, the Original Gospel Teachings were set forth to the lost prodigal sons and daughters how to enter into a Coverture Marriage with the Logos/Son of God.   Therefore, the Original Gospel teachings did not tell people what to believe -- but rather, how to tap into the Universal Source of Truth within them, and Experience the Truth.  Jesus taught his followers: "If you stick with this, living out what I tell you, you are my disciples for sure. Then you will experience for yourselves the truth, and the truth will free you" (John 8:31-32 TheMessage).  Jesus didn't say that they would believe the truth -- or that they would discern what they believed would be dogmatic truth out of the scriptures or some book written by other men -- but rather, Jesus conveyed to them that if they follow in TheWay of the New Covenant that he inaugurated, that they "...will experience for yourselves the truth, ...and it is this SELF-EXPERIENCED TRUTH that...will free you" from the error and ignorance that consumes the people of this world -- and especially the blind guides who portray themselves as rabbis, teachers, clergy, religious leaders and authorities. 
That the historical man Jesus was a true Holy Man who became the Anointed (Messiah/Christ) by fulfilling the Royal Law within himself, is attested to at Acts 2:22 where Jesus is portrayed as "a man, attested to you by God" -- and this was demonstrated by God performing "mighty works and wonders and signs that God did through him in your midst".   If Jesus was himself God incarnate as believed by the later Romans, then these words portraying Jesus as a man approved by God through the works and wonders that God did through him, never would have been presented in this manner.   When the people questioned the source of Jesus' words, he called himself a prophet: "So they were offended at Him. But Jesus said to them, A prophet is not without honor except in his own country and in his own house" (Matt 13:57). And not only did he call himself a prophet, but spoke of the crucifixion as his ultimate process of perfection:  "On that very day some Pharisees came, saying to Him, Get out and depart from here, for Herod wants to kill You.  And He said to them, Go, tell that fox, 'Behold, I cast out demons and perform cures today and tomorrow, and the third day I shall be perfected.' Nevertheless I must journey today, tomorrow, and the day following; for it cannot be that a prophet should perish outside of Jerusalem" (Luke 13:31-33 NKJ).   And when the man approached Jesus calling him good teacher, Jesus rejected the title stating: "So Jesus said to him, Why do you call Me good? No one is good but One, that is, God" (Mark 10:18 NKJ).   And when it was recognized that the man was asking Jesus about how to achieve eternal life -- and that Jesus did not reply to believe in him (Jesus) as God -- but to keep the Law and the Commandments -- then the Ebionite position that Jesus became the Anointed (Messiah/Christ) by fulfilling the Law -- and that it was necessary for Jesus' disciples and followers to in like manner fulfill the Law and keep the Commandments -- is exactly what Jesus the Anointed Prophet taught and expected of those who believed in what he taught.    Now if you add to the above the very words attributed to Jesus', we can understand both the original Ebionite position that the followers of Jesus must keep the Law, and the profound spiritual ignorance which rejects the requirement of actions as an integral part of the equation: "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.  Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.  For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven" (Matt 5:17-26 NIV). 

Thursday, December 20, 2018

The Universal Journey In TheWay

The Universal Journey In TheWay
I was asked in the Ex-Christian group what my mission was? I made the following answer:

When everyone passes from this life, they will have to evaluate the life that they lived. The Christians will be confronted with the fact that their religion has nothing in common with the original Gospel teachings (see ). The ex-Christians will be confronted with the fact that if they had sought the essence of the Gospel, they could have found the Truth that could have helped them prevail in their life. The Atheists will be confronted by the fact that while they were right about the bogus fraud with respect to the Jesus-god of Constantine (see The Unforgivable Sin Of The Church ), that if they had sought the Truth, they would have found it.

All of them will attempt to say: How was I to know? There are a number of Inner Paths into the Core of each person's Mind that will reveal to them the Truth of all Truths. And the Gospels were written as a universal text-book for tapping into the Inner Source that exists within each of us. Admittedly, the path has been made more difficult because of the corruption of the Gospels by the Church. And my mission in entering this life was to restore the most important teachings that were suppressed, in order to enable them to overcome the corruption.

It is not my job to worry about who reads these writings. The Internet provides the opportunity to set these writings before the people world-wide -- and I am often contacted by seekers around the world who have read them. But, the Spirit guides key people to these writings. While the vast majority of people use the Internet for shopping, porn and social nonsense, there are people whose souls are evolved enough to find their answers in these writings. Therefore, when they get to the hereafter, and they are then able to examine the life they lived, and attempt to make excuses for themselves, they will be confronted by the fact that they were provided the answers, but refused to engage as a seeker. And in these writings I explain how EVERYONE has the ability to tap into the Inner Source of Truth, if they are willing to develop those aspects of mind that enable them to do so. Therefore, they don't have to believe anything -- because each person who walks the face of the earth has the innate ability to tap into the Source of Universal Knowledge within them, and know the Truth of all Truths.

There is no judgement day as envisioned by the faux-church and institutionalized religion. The life we are living is as a learning experience and a testing to see if we can advance. But since we have the ability to review any thought or point in our life, it is impossible to make excuses for our failures. An important part of mental and spiritual development is the exercise of our freewill and choices, and then live out these choices in order to experience them. Since most people are complacent followers who never make the effort to seek and prove the truth, their Soul has yet to evolve. And they live life after life making gains at a snails pace (see Soul-Evolution - Reincarnation And Soul-Development ). In the case of critics and atheists, while they are intelligent enough to see that the Church is a fraud, are they intelligent enough to recognize and embrace the valid path of truth when they encounter it.

The fact that I have never had a teacher -- neither am I part of any church or organized religion -- and my only Teacher is the Source within me -- that exists equally within everyone. I lived the first 25 years of my life mentally undeveloped and spiritually disenfranchised, until I encountered truths that began my search for the greater truth. And this was orchestrated, so that no one could make excuses. If I could arise out of cultural ignorance, then so can anyone else.

By restoring the original Gospel teachings, I have done the major work that is necessary to restore these important teachings. Which means that no one who has encountered these writings, will have an excuse for not considering what is presented. The bottom line is that they chose not to seek truth when it was presented to them. Each of us has a Higher Self (see ) that guides us -- so in most instances, those who encounter these writings were guided to them by their own Higher Soul-Self, but they chose to ignore their own True-Self. And when they get to the hereafter, this failure to listen to their True-Self and the Source within them, will be their own failure.

Friday, December 14, 2018

Do Jews Believe in Heaven or Reincarnation (or Both)?

An interesting article that opens the door to a more enlightened understanding of the Soul of man, is the Chabad article by Aron Moss entitled, Do Jews Believe in Heaven or Reincarnation (or Both)?  In fact, this is one of the few articles that provides a higher understanding of how the Soul evolves to Wholeness and Perfection (see Wholeness of Mind & Being ) over the course of many unique lives.  I use the term unique, because unlike the Eastern teachings where the same personality continues to incarnate, the Jewish teachings parallel that of the Original Gospel teachings by portraying each soul-generated life as a unique personality.  

What the the Chabad article states is that part of our Soul dwells in Spirit, while another part of us sojourns in this physical life -- and this portrayal of Soul-Reality parallels the teaching of Jesus that was suppressed by the Church of Rome.    Quoting from Gospel of Thomas (GofT) Saying 84 - The Foundation Of The Soul And The Threefold Self : (84) Jesus said, "When you see your likeness, you rejoice. But when you see your images which came into being before you, and which neither die nor become manifest, how much you will have to bear!"  When it states that  "When you see your likeness, you rejoice..." -- because your Likeness is your pre-existent Soul that remains in Spirit while you, as a soul-generated image, sojourns in this physical world.  Whereas, the portrayal of "...your images which came into being before you, and which neither die nor become manifest", is representative of those previous soul-generated (lives) that your Soul lived as, that failed to achieve the necessary Wholeness and Perfection that is able to enable the image-personality to become Manifest through the process of achieving the next stage of birth which can be called, Soul-Birth -- wherein, you fulfill the adage to Know Thyself by becoming At-One with your True-Self -- i.e., your Soul-Self. 
In the Chabad article this process is portrayed in the words: "...when your time comes to leave this life, the activated parts of your soul go to a higher place, because that part of you has completed its mission on earth. But if you have unused soul potential, if you didn't activate all of the energy invested in you, then that unused part of your soul comes back again in another body to finish the job.  So when someone passes away, we pray that their soul find rest in heaven, because that's where the already-used part of the soul is found. As for the unused part of the soul, it will come back down for another go-round."  That part of each life that had achieved degrees of Wholeness, remains with the Soul in Spirit.  And in each life, a new soul-generated personality re-enters this physical world in order to work on those aspects of the Soul that has yet to achieve the necessary Wholeness that initiates Soul-Birth and what GofT saying 84 portrays as becoming Manifest.  

Most people don't generally remember the previous lives their Soul has lived, because they came into being at physical conception when their Soul generated a new soul-image.  Most people never achieve what can be portrayed as Soul-Memory that enables them to recall their Soul's previous lives, because their mental and spiritual development became derailed because of their adopted beliefs that inhibit spiritual progress, their thinking and mindset that are an obstacle to mental-development, and the living of carnal-driven lifestyles (see Arrested Mental Development ).  But with each life the Soul lives, as a greater number of soul-generated personalities achieve degrees of Wholeness, each new soul-generated personality is able to arise to higher levels of spiritual manifestation because of the Spiritual DNA they inherited from their Higher Soul-Self.  The Rabbi Yisrael Ben Eliezer who came to be known by Chassidic Jews as the Baal Shem Tov (The Master of the Good Name), was able to achieve the necessary heightened levels of of spirituality, because of the Spiritual DNA he inherited through the advancement of his Soul over many previous lives.  The same was true of the man known today as Jesus.   And this is true of all of mankind.  That these truths are not understood today by the vast majority of non-Chassidic Jews, and the body of Christians who adhere to the dogma of the fourth century Church of Rome, is because both groups fail to live their daily lives in accord with their respective teachings.  In the case of Christians, while their scriptures were corrupted and the most important spiritual teachings were suppressed and even outlawed by the Church, the Original Gospel Teachings have been restored and can be read at .  While the Spiritual DNA of the man Jesus enabled him to present the teachings of TheWay to the people in the first century, and his Spiritual DNA enabled Rabbi Eliezer to restore the spiritual essence of Judaism, my own Spiritual DNA enabled me to restore the Original Gospel teachings that were suppressed by the Church of Rome.             

Friday, November 30, 2018

Was Jesus Born Of A Physical Virgin?

With respect to the portrayal of Mary as a Virgin -- I replied to a post on FaceBook with the following:

The allegorical portrayal of virginity has an important spiritual meaning -- and this is why those who have achieved purity of the flesh, are always portrayed as virgins awaiting the BrideGroom.  This is ultra-important because the original followers and disciples of Jesus did not believe that he was born of a physical virgin (see The Ebionite Nazirenes ) -- and it should be noted that the family of Jesus as Ebionites, did not ascribe to the physical virgin birth -- (quoting): It must be noted that the mother and family of Jesus were all Ebionites -- as was his brother Jacob who they call James, and was the leader of the Ebionite Community.   In the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Gibbon notes that the teachings of Jesus was “…embraced by great numbers of the Therapeutae, or Essinians…”, and wrote that: “Le Clerc (Hist. Ecclesiast p. 477, 535) seems to have collected from Eusebius, Jerome, Epiphanius, and other writers, all the principle circumstances that relate to the Nazarenes or Ebionites. The nature of their opinions soon divided them into a stricter and milder sect; and there is some reason to conjecture that the family of Jesus remained members, at least, of the latter and more moderate party”.   The Ebionites who were totally faithful to the Original Gospel teaching, understood that the Kingdom or Second Coming can only come within the mind and body of the seeker/disciple who lives the necessary Consecrated Life in TheWay  (see The End Times - Armageddon/Rapture - The Coming Of The Kingdom ).

Quoting from : The Shepherd of Hermas that it was "...the most popular books, if not the most popular book, in the Christian Church during the second, third, and fourth centuries...", it remains unknown to the modern Church. Why? Why was the book that is representative of the core Gospel of the earliest Gentile Church, no longer is use today? Because while Hermas reflected the original teachings of Jesus and TheWay, it would be deemed heresy by the modern Church. And when rightly understood, the fact of the matter is that it is impossible for the modern believer, critic, biblical expert or scholar to in any manner understand the message that Hermas bears. Which means that if the Shepherd of Hermas was indeed the most popular scripture in the Gentile Church over the first three centuries, then it can rightly be stated that the modern Church has virtually nothing in common with the pre-Nicene Gentile Church.

In the Shepherd of Hermas a reference is made to a tower, of which it is written: “And the tower, I asked, what does it mean? This tower, he replied, is the Church. And these virgins, who are they? They are Holy Spirits, and men cannot otherwise be found in the kingdom of God unless these have put their clothing upon them: for if you receive the name only, and do not receive from them the clothing, they are of no advantage to you. For these virgins are the powers of the Son of God. If you bear His name but possess not His power, it will be in vain that you bear His name”.

In understanding what is written, it is most important for us to be aware of the continual message found in the words: “If you bear His name but possess not His power, it will be in vain that you bear His name”. Thus, if you call yourselves Christian, but fail to purify and develop your mind and body from the defilements of this world -- and do not possess the true Knowledge of the Spiritual Christ -- and have not yourselves inherited the same higher powers of mind that the Son of God promised all his followers would possess -- then “it will be in vain that you bear His name”.

The allegorical symbolism of the Virgin birth is representative of the purified flesh and lower nature that must be fertilized by Joseph, which is an allegorical portrayal of the Generative Power of the Kingdom.   And unless you are yourself born of the purified lower nature and the Generative Power of the Kingdom, then you cannot achieve the next stages of Birth.  And the reality correctly portrays the modern quasi-follower of Jesus when it states: “If you bear His name but possess not His power, it will be in vain that you bear His name”.  In view of the fact that modern Christianity has absolutely nothing in common with the Original Gospel teachings (see ), it is in vain that modern believers even call themselves Christian. 

Wednesday, November 21, 2018

Paul The Apostate

I had made the statement in one of the Nazirene forums that Paul was a spiritual fraud. I was asked to clarify this, and wrote the following in clarification:

When I said that Paul as an Apostle, was fictitious, it was because the scriptures are not historical -- they are portrayals of the body, mind and spirit. The events reported are allegorical, and they did not historically happen. What was being presented in the Book of Acts was the evolution of Conscious. Quoting from Inconsistencies Intentionally Written Into The Scriptures 

In order to force the reader to stop, and contemplate the inner spiritual message, a conflicting account is purposely entered into the scriptures: Acts 9:7 reads: “And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man”. Yet, in Acts 22:9 the narrative reads: “And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me”. It means absolutely nothing for the modern reader to believe that Saul was converted on the road to Damascus -- there is no spiritual edification or uplifting when we relate this knowledge to an historical event at the beginning of our Common Era. But what is conveyed spiritually is of great value to the disciple in search of the Light -- and must bring about a change of mind in his quest to open the door to the Kingdom. Thus the disciple begins to see his own transformation from the death of Stephen as spirit became clothed with flesh, to Saul -- from a Jew to Paul (the name means "little one" -- from Paul the little one, whose blindness was healed by Ananias -- the gift from God.

The transformation of Consciousness is presented in the meaning of the names. And when you realize that the Gospels teach that all of mankind are born blind (see Soul-Evolution - Reincarnation And Soul-Development ), then what you are being presented with in the meaning of the names, is the evolution of Consciousness. But because of the misinterpretation of the Book of Acts, a number of Gentiles wrote and taught under the name of Paul, and they claimed to be apostles. Quoting from 

Few modern Christians are even aware of the historical dispute between Peter and Paul -- or why the original Ebionite Nazirenes opposed Paul -- or the fact that they are not following the religion of Jesus, but more so the tenets of Simon Magus and the religion of Mithraism. Under the heading of Simon Magus in the 11th edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica it states pertaining to the writings attributed to Clement, the disciple of Peter, in the Homilies: “…the common source of these documents may be as early as the 1st century, and must have consisted in a polemic against Paul, emanating from the Jewish side of Christianity. Paul being thus identified with Simon, it was argued that Simon's visit to Rome had no other basis than Paul's presence there, and, further, that the tradition of Peter's residence in Rome rests on the assumed necessity of his resisting the arch-enemy of Judaism there as elsewhere”

The whole foundation of salvation by faith without any requirement of actions -- and salvation can be acquired regardless of how one lives their lives -- has totally destroyed the very Gospel foundation. And I can't even say that Christianity is Mithraism under a different name, because the Initiates of Mithraism were known as Christians before the name was applied to the people of TheWay. Quoting from CHRISTIANITY EXISTED PRIOR TO THE BIRTH OF JESUS ( )

Today we call ourselves by the Greek word Christian -- but have we ever questioned where the term originated? And what does it mean? The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge confirms that the name "originated outside of Christian and Jewish circles". The Mercer Dictionary of the Bible states that: "By the late first and early second centuries the name ‘Christian,’ which early believers avoided using of themselves, was beginning to be accepted". 

If modern believers were truly sincere in their desire for a more intimate relationship with the Lord, they would immediately want to know and question why "early believers avoided" using the name Christian? When it is realized that even the very name Christian was in use prior to the time of Jesus, we truly begin to grasp the Pagan connection. The name Christian was a term employed to describe one who was an initiate, and understood the inner meaning of the Greek and Roman mystery religions. Thus, the early followers of Jesus refused to be called Christian, and call Jesus the Christ, because the word was used in reference to enlightened Pagans and their gods. 

Prior to being corrupted, the Epistles associated with Paul were preaching Mithraism and the seeking of becoming the Anointing (Christ). One of the first corruptions of these Epistles was when they added the name Jesus in conjunction with the word Christ. In reality, the whole of Christiandom is Mithraism that is being supported with a spiritually castrated set of Gospels.