Brother Of Yeshua/Jesus

Saturday, April 15, 2017

Answering The Questions Of Life

Shabbat Shalom Seekers: 

On FaceBook I was asked why I think it is my duty to provide the answers to arcane questions of life. And as spiritually advanced soul who perceives the diabolical environment of Revealed Religion and the seduction of what Deists call priest-craft, my answer should go to the very core of why spiritually mature souls reject of the majority of religions. In answer to this question I wrote:  

If you had fulfilled the wisdom of the ancients to Know Thyself -- i.e., your True-Self -- then arcane questions would not exist. The very purpose of the life we are living is self-development and self-knowledge -- and yet, both our religions, and the very halls of academia do more to alienate the people from the knowledge of their True-Self -- thereby undermining the very purpose and objective of life (see Academia And The Feminist Cultural War On Women ).  

The good part of the equation of life is that you don't have to believe me, or anyone else for that matter. Why? Because you True-Self that cannot manifest in the organic body of man because of the physical limitations, already knows more than all the libraries and storehouses of worldly wisdom and knowledge. Which means that all one has to do to know the answers to life's greatest enigmas, is to seek and Know Thyself by escaping the limitations of Plato's Cave of illusions (see Plato's Cave ). 

Do you know that Peter, the disciple of Jesus, stated that there was no reason for Moses and even Jesus, if the people as personified in the parable of the prodigal son, would seek this self-knowledge (see The Original Teachings Have Nothing In Common With Church Dogma )? And as your brother who has himself escaped the Cave over the course of many lifetimes of being in service to mankind, I am only here conveying to others how to find the Truth and the Kingdom within them. This is why my soul entered into this life. And this is what I do (see ).


Saturday, April 01, 2017

The Original Gospel vs the quasi-Gnostic Teachings of the Iranian Prophet Mani and the Church

It is easily proven that what is embraced as Christianity today, has virtually nothing in common with the Original Gospel Teachings (see  The Original Teachings Have Nothing In Common With Church Dogma ).   To understand what follows, it is necessary to read and understand the foregoing link which proves that modern Christianity has virtually nothing in common with the Original Gospel Teachings.

A most important teaching that is representative of one of the primary reasons they portray the Homilies of Clement as pseudo-Clement is the statement: For even the Hebrews who believe Moses, and do not observe the things spoken by him, are not saved, unless they observe the things that were spoken to them. For their believing Moses was not of their own will, but of God, who said to Moses, Behold, I come to thee in a pillar of cloud, that the people may hear me speaking to thee, and may believe thee for ever. Since, therefore, both to the Hebrews and to those who are called from the Gentiles, believing in the teachers of truth is of God, while excellent actions are left to every one to do by his own judgment, the reward is righteously bestowed upon those who do well. For there would have been no need of Moses, or of the coming of Jesus, if of themselves they would have understood what is reasonable. Neither is there salvation in believing in teachers and calling them lords”.

What this means is that the soul who lived as Jesus was the first prodigal son to return to the Edenic Kingdom -- i.e.,  "...For there would have been no need of Moses, or of the coming of Jesus, if of themselves they would have understood what is reasonable".   Which confirms the Gospel statement "They that are whole have no need of the physician, but they that are sick: I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance" (Mark 2:17).   Which means that anyone who achieves Wholeness, does not need a physician, a savior, scriptures or even a teacher.   And this is a reality that the modern Church cannot live with.   In Truth, every prodigal son has within himself an innate connection to the Indwelling Logos -- as personified at The True Prophet  And when you are able to achieve the necessary subsequent stages of birth, in the same way that achieving Soul-Birth enables you to manifest your Soul and True-Self (see ), in achieving the Final Stage Of Birth you are then able to manifest the Indwelling Logos (aka Son of God).   Thereby enabling the Son of God to manifest in the flesh through you.   Which is why Jesus stated that those prodigal sons and daughters who followed him as their pattern, "will do even greater things than" what he accomplished (John 14:12).   In the same way that the historical man Jesus was the first of the prodigal sons to accomplish this manifestation of Godliness, so too does every prodigal son have this same potential -- and eventual Destiny in the Omega of Creation.      

The above teachings are virtually impossible for those who Paul portrays as being of an organic "natural" consciousness to comprehend the above process (see Animal-Soul )..   And when the Gospel was presented to the multitude of faith-based believers, it had to be made appropriate for their level of very limited comprehension.  It is generally recognized that nobody can go on to secondary school without having completed an elementary education.  Nor can a person be admitted to a university without having a secondary education.  These graduations automatically “select” those able to become active members of the cultural elite of human society.  The problem is that what is true with respect to cultural academics, is also true of organic man's ability to comprehend his own higher spiritual soul-reality.   Which is why the pre-Nicene Church was a threefold spiritual healing center (see The Christian Secret Doctrine ).  And when the Church was attacked in the second century by Celus as being a "secret system" -- teaching the faith-based undeveloped multitudes what Paul portrayed as the "milk for babes" in the form of the "traditions" of Christ -- while reserving the inner spiritual meaning of the Gospel for those who had achieved a level of spiritual maturity that enabled them to comprehend what was incomprehensible for the multitude of believers -- in the reply to the allegations against the Church by the pagan philosopher Celsus, it was noted that the elementary doctrines which survive today as the foundation of faith-based Christianity, was said to be “...preached in the Churches… for the simpleminded and for the ears of the common crowd who are led on to live better lives by their belief” (Origen Contra Celsum) -- i.e., a starting point.   Why?  Because as Paul stated, the multitude of Christians were incapable of comprehending anything beyond the "traditions" of Christ.   

The Church was a true spiritual source and healing center until the "traditions" of the immature faith-based believers became the only acceptable doctrines of belief by the intervention of the secular authority by the Roman Emperor Constantine -- who hunted down and murdered the Ebionite Nazirenes and Spiritual Christians as heretics.  Thus, Edward Gibbon writes in the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire: ”Constantine easily believed that the heretics, who presumed to dispute his opinions or to oppose his commands, were guilty of the most absurd and criminal obstinancy... Not a moment was lost in excluding the ministers and teachers of the separated congregations from any share of the rewards and immunities which the emperor had so liberally bestowed on the orthodox clergy. But as the sectaries might still exist under the cloud of royal disgrace, the conquest of the East was immediately followed by an edict which announced their total destruction” 

In order to explain away the great many voids when Constantine merged the religions under his authority, and recreated the Church in accord with the teachings of Mani which has been portrayed as quasi faux-gnostic teachings based upon Manichaean and Mithraic dogma (see ).   Under the control of Constantine, the man Jesus who was the first of the prodigal sons to return to the Edenic Kingdom was converted into the Mithraic god, savior and redeemer based upon the teachings of the Iranian prophet Mani which was the foundation of the Augustinian doctrine of Original Sin where a savior/redeemer was necessary for man's salvation from a fallen state -- resulting in the reality that what is preached from the pulpits of the modern Church has virtually nothing in common with the purpose and objectives of the Original Gospel Teachings of TheWay.   That the Bible itself was corrupted -- with many of the most important spiritual teachings removed ( ) -- makes it difficult for the modern Christians to restore the Original Gospel Teachings.   But the Hand of God moved to answer the prayers of sincere believers, and provided the Gospel of Thomas ( ) that contains many of the teachings which the Church of Constantine removed from the Gospels.  And to provide an understanding of the application of the Gospel teachings in one's daily life, many sincere Christians the world over have been guided to, and discovered, the Ebionite Nazirene Restoration writings that fills the void in what the suppression of the original Gospel teachings created (see ).    

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Do Modern Church Mithraic-Christians Have Salvation?

The following is a reply to a letter asking why the Original followers of Jesus did not believe he was God-Incarnate:

Jesus taught that the Kingdom is within you (see The Fatal Error Of The Church ) -- which means that there are inner realities of mind and being that is not of this world.  With respect to the beginning of John: The interpretation of the word The Word, is from the Greek word Logos -- meaning, The Mind of God (see ).   And if you read the words of the Apostle Peter as preserved in the Homilies of his disciple Clement (see The True Prophet ), you will find that the Logos or Son of God that is portrayed as the True Prophet, is equally within the mind of all of mankind.   And, as documented in the earliest of Church writings, Jesus was a true holy man who fulfilled the Law within himself, and became the Anointed (Messiah/Christ) at his baptism.   Quoting from The Ebionite Nazirene Witness  
The witness of the disciples who personally knew Jesus, that he was a man who was Anointed (Messiah/Christ) by God -- but they changed the very words of God spoken to mankind -- i.e., "Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee".  What these original Ten Words spoken by the Father to mankind presented, was that the original EbioniteNazirene disciples of Jesus remained totally faithful to the Gospel teachings.   If, as the very words of God spoken to mankind stated, that Jesus became the Messiah (Anointed) and Son of God by living the necessary Consecrated Life that enabled him to fulfill the Law within himself, then the truth of the Gospel is found in the witness of the Ebionite who held firmly to the position that Jesus "...was justified by fulfilling the Law. He was the Christ of God, since not one of the rest of mankind had observed the Law completely. Had any one else fulfilled the commandments of the Law, he would have been the Christ, for they assert that our Lord Himself was a man in like sense with all humanity" (see Hippolytus,Refut. Omn. Haer. vii. 34).   When the Ebionite Nazirenes  make reference to the Law, this very much includes the Laws of Creation as portrayed in the words "...the designs/laws found throughout Nature and all of Creation".    That the historical man Jesus was a pattern for all of mankind because of his success in overcoming the Laws, is demonstrated in the words: "He was the Christ of God, since not one of the rest of mankind had observed the Law completely. Had any one else fulfilled the commandments of the Law, he would have been the Christ..."   And this confirms this statement with respect to the true potential of all of mankind that Jesus taught, as demonstrated in the words of Hippolytus when he wrote that they believed that when anyone "...thus fulfill the law, they are able to become Christs" (Hippolytus, Refut. Omn. Haer. vii. 34 - see ).   And this is why Jesus taught that he was our brother -- i.e., "Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am returning to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God'" (John 20:17 NIV).     
That the historical Jesus was a true holy man who became the Anointed (Messiah/Christ by fulfilling the Royal Law within himself, is attested to at Acts 2:22 where Jesus is portrayed as "a man, attested to you by God" -- and this was demonstrated by God performing "mighty works and wonders and signs that God did through him in your midst".   If Jesus was himself God incarnate as believed by the later Romans, then these words portraying Jesus as a man approved by God through the works and wonders that God did through him, never would have been presented in this manner.  
The heathen and pagan mind of the mainstream of Gentiles always had great difficulty in understanding the difference between the man Jesus, the Indwelling Logos/Son of God which is representative of the Mind of God (see The Logos), and the One Teacher which Jesus commanded all who would call themselves his disciples and followers, were to seek out and learn from (see The True Prophet).   And it was the living of the necessary Consecrated Life that Jesus ordained, and the seeking of the Kingdom within, that enabled the historical Jesus to become the Messiah, and At-One with the Indwelling Logos/Son of God.   And this is especially demonstrated in the words of Edward Gibbon with respect to the original position of the Ebionite Nazirene disciples of Jesus that he was in “...supernatural union of a man and God... In their eyes, Jesus of Nazareth was a mere mortal, the legitimate son of Joseph and Mary: but he was the best and wisest of the human race, selected as the worthy instrument to restore upon earth the worship of the true and supreme Deity. When he was baptized in the Jordan, the Christ, the first of the aeons, the Son of God himself, descended on Jesus in the form of a dove, to inhabit his mind, and direct his actions during the allotted period of his ministry” (Gibbon; The Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire, V.4, P.366). 
The original Gospels prior to the very Words of God that was spoken to mankind was corrupted by the Church of Constantine, confirmed the above when at his baptism in the Jordan the actual words spoken stated: "Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee".  That the spiritually degenerate leaders of the fourth century pagan Church of Rome could not comprehend the difference between being the Logos -- and fulfilling the Law to become At-One with the Logos -- thereby manifesting the Logos in the world by proxy -- does not mean that the spiritually degenerate pagans are correct.  

In the subheading entitled The Original Teachings Have Nothing In Common With Church Dogma , I demonstrate that the whole of modern Church dogma is totally based upon the faux-gnosticism of Mithraic and Manichaean sources -- supported by the removal of the most important spiritual teachings in the Gospels (see ).   And in view of the fact that Mithraic initiates were called Christians prior to the birth of my brother Jesus -- i.e., The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge confirms that the name Christian "originated outside of Christian and Jewish circles". The Mercer Dictionary of the Bible states that: "By the late first and early second centuries the name ‘Christian,’ which early believers avoided using of themselves, was beginning to be accepted". -- which means that you are a Mithraic-Christian who has virtually nothing in common with the original followers of Jesus or the original Gospel teachings of TheWay.   
The Mithraic-Christians believed that Jesus was the latest incarnation of the Mithra, the sun-god who was born on Dec. 25th and resurrected on Easter (Ishtar).  Mithraic (and Manichaean) teachings are based upon the doctrine of Original Sin -- which has no place in the Original Gospel Teachings (see The Folly Of Original Sin: ).  And as demonstrated in the above and on the links provided, the belief that Jesus was the latest incarnation in the Mithraic sun-god as taught by the Church of Rome which corrupted the scriptures to support their dogma, has virtually nothing in common with the Original Gospel Teachings of TheWay.   And since unlike you, I am not a Mithraic-Christian -- and having myself come to TheCall ( ) and have been taught directly by the Indwelling Logos (aka Son of God/True Prophet), I remain totally faithful to the Original Gospel Teachings of TheWay.   

You better pray that the belief in the Mithraic-Christ provides you the salvation you seek.   It appears to me that you have been seduced by the god of this world.

Sunday, February 05, 2017

Using The Scriptures As The Key Of Knowledge

At a certain point in a person's spiritual development, they must become aware of the holographic reality of the Divine Pattern of Creation that is replicated into every aspect of the Whole.  In a holographic pattern, the reality of one level has parallel qualities on all levels.   The Gospel of Thomas states: (5) Jesus said, "Recognize what is in your sight, and that which is hidden from you will become plain to you..." ( ).  What you are actually perceiving is a reflection of your own mind.   Which is reflected in the Delphic Oracle in the words: "Heed these words, you who wish to probe the depths of Nature: If you do not find within your Self that which you seek, neither will you find it outside.  If you ignore the wonders of your own House, how do you expect to find other wonders?  In you is hidden the Treasure of Treasures.  Know Thyself and you will know the Universe and the Gods."

As enlightened mystics and visionaries, the authors of the scriptures understood the above reality as explored at .   And they used the allegorical language of the Soul in which this world of shadow-images ( ) is composed -- which is why the Gospel of Thomas states to "Recognize what is in your sight...", because what you think you see is a reflection of your own condition of mind and thinking.   When you look at the scriptures you think you are perceiving Jesus -- but what is being presented is an allegorical portrayal of your own mind that is being reflected back to you.   And when you are going to use the scriptures for their intended purpose as the Key of Knowledge ( ), the rule is that once a person, place or thing is used in the scriptures, the reference is no longer to anything or person external to self -- but is portraying an aspect of your own mind.  As an example, the Gospel of Thomas states: “The disciples said to Jesus, We know that you will depart from us. Who is to be our leader? Jesus said to them, Wherever you are, you are to go to James the righteous, for whose sake heaven and earth came into being" -- and as explored at , unless you personify within your own mind and being what is portrayed in the name Jacob/James, then you will never understand either your own self, or any aspect of the life you are living.   And this is also true of when the scriptures utilize the name Jesus as a final pattern and reality of mind that you must bring about within your own Self.   And this is also true of all the rest of the names, places and things portrayed in the text of the scriptures.   

In the Fourth Fatal Mistake in the article on the Key of Knowledge ( ) the Church Father Origen makes reference to Paul's portrayal of the scriptures as the "letter that killeth [and] Jewish folktales" (see 2 Cor 3:6; Titus 1:14) when read literally, and writes with respect to using the scriptures as the Key of Knowledge:
“But all the narrative portion, relating either to the marriages, or to the begetting of the children, or to battles of different kinds, or to any other histories whatever, what else can they be supposed to be, save the forms and figures of hidden and sacred things? As men, however, make little effort to exercise their intellect, or imagine that they possess knowledge before they really learn, the consequence is that they never begin to have knowledge"
What does this mean?   What it means is that "...all the narrative portion [of the scriptures], relating either to the marriages, or to the begetting of the children, or to battles of different kinds, or to any other histories whatever", do not at all pertain to historical accounts of man's more distant past -- but rather, to the Forces and Laws that are presently working within man's own mind and being.   Why?   How could Origen who was called the prince of Christian learning second only to the Apostles themselves, state that the historical interpretation of the scriptures is "worthless"?  And that what is presented in the written text as marriages, the begetting of children, and the many various wars and battles are not at all historical -- but rather, an allegorical portrayal of the Forces and Laws working within one's own mind and being?
What Origen states is true -- and when you read of a marriage or the begetting of children or any other portrayal of what appears to be history, is in reality presenting the Realities, Laws and Forces of your own Mind.   And this includes Jesus, the Virgin Birth, the twelve disciples and even the crucifixion.   Unless you bring what is allegorical portrayed in the scriptures about within your own mind and being, then you will fail to bring about the necessary subsequent stages of birth that will permit you to enter Into the Promise of Life. If you read the scriptures as historical narratives in the manner of the Jews, then you will have thrown away the Key of Knowledge. 

Friday, January 27, 2017

Has Donald Trump Become A Savior?

If a man saves millions of people from inherent sin that will cast them into extreme suffering in what Jesus called the "outer darkness" of Mind and Being (see ) -- i.e., “Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows” (Gal 6:7 NIV) -- then he can rightly be portrayed as their savior.  With respect to the Holocaust of the UnBorn, The Didache (a.k.a. The Teaching of the Apostles), which is one of the oldest Christian documents, at Section 2:2 states: "...thou shalt not murder a child by abortion nor kill them when born..." -- and at 5:2 it states: "The Way of Death is filled with people who are...murderers of children and abortionists of God's creatures."    It has been conveyed to me from On High that abortion is murder -- and even those who support abortion, are therefore acting in concert with murderers.   

Those who understand the Laws That Control Our Lives , will perceive that those who voted for Barack Obama and who promote abortion, will themselves inherit the evil, suffering and murder that they perpetuated upon the souls that have been aborted.  When Vice Pres. Mike Pence spoke at the pro-life rally, he openly declared the opposition of the Executive Office of the President against the holocaust that has been perpetuated upon the unborn -- and if this speech of Vice Pres. Pence is followed up by a denial of funding in support of abortion, then the people who voted for Donald Trump will be freed from the sin that will engulf those who support the murder of the unborn.  Those who sowed the murder of the unborn, will suffer a similar fate in the future.   What is important is for Donald Trump to defund the infanticide of the unborn, so that those Americans who reject the murder of the fetus in its mother's womb, are not financially supporting this grave sin.    

I recently watched an interview with the Rev. William Owens who is  the head of the Coalition Of African-American Pastors (see ) wherein he stated that he was recently shown the documentation to prove that Pres. Lyndon Johnson started the War on Poverty so as to undermine the black family so they would basically vote Democrat -- i.e., make black women dependent upon the government and drive black men out of the family home.   And in such a scenario, abortion became a necessary ingredient to the spiritually disenfranchised equation.  In view of the fact that studies have proven that poverty and racial inequality is fueled by the breakup of the black family (see Marriage: America's Greatest Weapon Against Child Poverty,  the fact that it is demonstrated that those who live in poverty are in fact poor, because under the Secular Progressive domain, they have abandoned biblical morality and marriage. Thus, their poverty and the conditions under which they live, are the direct result of their own choices and actions.  And thus, not only those who abort their children are grave sinners, but so too are those who support the political culture of the Secular Progressives who have destroyed the black family, and promote abortion as a type of birth control.

Yet, Paul correctly states:"But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner — not even to eat with such a person" (1 Cor 5:11 NKJV) -- and the Gospels present the cause of their poverty and turmoil in the words of Jesus: "...sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto thee" (John 5:14 KJV).

What Paul is stating is that it is of course a sin to support the immorality and sinfulness of those who choose to dwell in sin. If Christians are commanded by Paul to have no part in the sin of those who have abandoned biblical morality -- to the degree that a Christian should "...not even to eat with such a person" -- and Jesus warns the person who he healed to cease from sin, lest a worse thing such as even greater poverty come upon them -- then when Christians use their money and resources to indiscriminately support and promote lives of sin, then they have in fact cast themselves in the role of the servant who squandered away his God-Given Talents on the things of this world.

The solution to the dilemma is found in the words of Benjamin Franklin who correctly stated: "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I travelled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer."

The poor and disenfranchised in this country is the direct result of the failed Secular Progressive agenda they have embraced. Author, and one time welfare mom Star Parker, portrays the poor as the victims of Uncle Sam's Plantation. God-fearing people are in no manner obligated to support the lifestyle of those who abandon morality and biblical standards. While it is good to provide food and clothing to those in need, to take away from those who are living by spiritual standards, to give to those who have abandoned spiritual standards, is in and of itself sin.  Further, financial support and pay for abortion on demand, is one of the greatest evils of our hedonist godless culture.