Why Are Some People Born Homosexual? Why Is Homosexuality Rejected In The Bible?

Why are some people born homosexual?   Why is homosexuality rejected in the Bible?  These are crucial questions that modern Christian clergy find themselves in the position of making policy, without understanding the wisdom of the scriptures on the subject of homosexuality.   Because the Church corrupted the scriptures in order to make them support the doctrines of pagan Rome, modern Christians have been deprived of the necessary understanding to comprehend why some people are born homosexual (see http://ChristianReincarnation.org).  And thus, modern clergy now find themselves in the unenviable position of making Church policy without understanding why the Bible rejects homosexuality. 

In response to a recent Washington Post article by Sarah Pulliam Bailey entitled How Rachel Held Evans became the most polarizing woman in evangelicalism, I sent the following email to Sarah Bailey:

Greetings Sarah:

Your article in the Washington Post on Rachel Held Evans (LINK) was brought to my attention.   There is no email address for RHE, and if you have one I would appreciate you forwarding this to her.  With respect to the LGBT community within the Church, the paramount question has not yet been asked -- i.e., why is a person born homosexual?   Quoting from my own article on the website http://ChristianReincarnation.org , under the subheading The Fourth Fatal Mistake Of The Church: 

If what Paul and the other Gospel Authors stated is true, and there exist higher realities and dimensions of being that are totally inconceivable to the mind of the undeveloped faith-based believer (see Mysteries Of The Gospel ) -- and by virtue of the immaturity of the faith-based believers brought about by an embryonic condition of mind which Paul portrayed as the "natural" mind of man -- and the limitations of this embryonic condition of mind even inhibited Jesus from conveying the true meaning of the scriptures, and the higher reality of the soul and the Kingdom to all but his inner core of disciples (see In The House - Taught In Parables) -- which means that the biblical authors were therefore powerless to explain in detail many of the most important Gospel teachings and concepts in the literal text of the New Testament -- then the spiritually mature author's of the scriptures who were themselves enlightened to these higher realities, remained virtually powerless to do anything more than to provide the people with a list of do's and don'ts -- so that the faith-based believers will be in a position where they will be better able to evolve to a mature understanding and comprehension of the teachings of Jesus and TheWay.   To totally ignore these do's and don'ts, without knowing the consequence of one's choices and actions, is paramount to walking out onto a freeway blindfolded. 

Before becoming institutionalized under Pagan Rome, the Church possessed a core-body of esoteric knowledge that explained and revealed all the enigmas that baffle the modern faith-based Christian.   But this body of knowledge was thrown way, and even outlawed by the emperors and priests who ruled over the Church.   From a man's perspective, women are both essential, and are not replaceable, and neither can two women spiritually replace a man.   There is an important reason why same-sex unions would be rejected in the scriptures and by the early Church.   And there is a higher spiritual purpose and reason for sex between a man and woman that is not at all understood today -- and this reason goes far beyond the idea that sex is for procreation.   If you would like to research this subject that is no longer understood today, you can begin to read at the subheading The Esoteric Feminine Mystique.   There is also a much shorter two part Blog article entitled The Tree Of Life And The Divine Marriage PART I, and PART II. 

If you have any questions with respect to the above, and reasons behind the do's and don'ts that remain ignored and not at all understood by the modern Church, I will gladly answer any question you have,  And if you would rather a phone conversation with myself (and my wife), I would be glad to be of assistance to you.  

GodSpeed in TheWay,

Allan Cronshaw

http://Cronshaw.us 

Modern man has been deprived of the essential knowledge to understand the spiritual reality of sex between a man and woman and the dynamic interaction of opposites.   But there is a simple experiment that would demonstrate the biological and spiritual factors that are presented in the above noted subheading entitled  The Esoteric Feminine Mystique.   In the same way that man and woman within the spectrum of the Divine Pattern of Creation are of an opposite polarity, so too is all aspects of Creation holographically imbued with these same opposite polarities.   Therefore, to begin to understand why, we should rewire our colleges and universities same-sex -- i.e., instead of being wired positive and negative, we should wire some buildings positive to positive, and other buildings negative to negative.   The lesson learned would be invaluable. 

In the separation of  Church and State, it must be recognized that the concept of sex as a sacrament between a committed husband and wife under the coverture of marriage, came into being through religion.   Which means that when government attempts to redefine the institution of marriage, they are in fact redefining a spiritual sacrament.   And while government has a compelling interest in promoting a civil union -- and said civil union can constitute whatever conditions are appropriate for the people involved -- government does not have the right to redefine a spiritual sacrament.   Therefore, in the upcoming ruling of the US Supreme Court, a wise decision would be to limit all government ordained unions -- even that of man and woman -- to a civil union.   As this would bring equality, while baring government from forcing religion to accept a secular-defined sacrament.   

Even more important, though, would be for clergy to read the above noted articles and gain an understanding of why the Bible rejects fornication, adultery, and same-sex unions.   Without the positive dynamics of an opposite polarity committed marriage, we are confusing the God-Ordained sacrament of sexual interaction between Husband and Wife in a Divine Marriage, with various forums of mutual masturbation.    And while everyone has the perfect right to express themselves sexually in any manner that pleases them -- so long as they don't forcefully impose themselves on the rights and freedoms of others -- there is a vast difference between the Sacrament of Sex in a Divinely Ordained Marriage, and the act of mutual masturbation which is commonly practiced in our cultural civil unions -- and this is true with respect to both same-sex, and opposite-sex unions