The Paradoxical Enigma Of The Senate Conformation Hearings

The Paradoxical Enigma Of The Senate Conformation Hearings

Were you perplexed by the Senate Confirmation hearings between Judge Brett Kavanaugh and Dr. Christine Blasey Ford?  You should be.  And what I will present is a human reality that you must understand before you are duped into making a judgment. 
What if both accounts were true -- and yet, the event as reported by Dr. Ford never happened as she portrayed it?  How can this be, you ask?  How can Christine Blasey Ford be correct, even though the three witnesses she named --  including a female best friend -- all stated under oath that the reported event never happened?  Yet, Christine Blasey Ford was telling the truth.  But so too was Brett Kavanaugh.  Thus, to understand the essence of this paradox where both conflicting statements are equally true, you must understand from a deeper human reality that few people in our modern culture are prepared to comprehend.  

The answer is found in the proper interpretation of the account of the woman who was brought before Jesus in the act of adultery when Jesus said to her accusers: "He that is without sin, let him cast the first stone".  But this word that Bible translators interpret as "sin" is unique, and only appears in this one single statement in the Gospels.  And if it were properly interpreted, what Jesus actually stated was: "He that is without sin in any lifetime, let him cast the first stone".   And if the question is posed: Why would Jesus even state such a thing as people have sinned in previous lives?  The answer is noted in the Hastings-Scribner Dictionary Of The Bible (New York, 1903. Bk 4, p. 63) where it is stated: "To affirm that Jews in Christ's time did not believe in pre-existence is simply incorrect".  And that for important spiritual reasons, organic man is blind to the previous lives their Soul has lived, is explored at Soul-Evolution - Reincarnation And Soul-Development http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#SoulEvolution .    And the fact that the disciples of Jesus were no longer limited by their organic human consciousness that inhibits a person's ability to see the previous lives their Soul has lived, is explored at Spiritual Amnesia http://AnInconvenientTruth.org#SpiritualAmnesia . 

When Jesus warned the man "...sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto thee" (John 5:14) -- he confirmed the doctrine that all the calamities of life are caused by man's sin and disobedience to the Royal Law of God as set forth in the Sermon on the Mount.   On the question itself that the disciples of Jesus asked -- i.e., Master, who did sin? -- the commentary Barnes’ Notes writes that: "It was a universal opinion among the Jews that calamities of all kinds were the effects of sin. The case, however, of this man was that of one that was blind from his birth, and it was a question which the disciples could not determine whether it was his fault or that of his parents. Many of the Jews, as it appears from their writings (see Lightfoot), believed in the doctrine of the transmigration of souls; or that the soul of a man, in consequence of sin, might be compelled to pass into other bodies, and be punished there. They also believed that an infant might sin before it was born (see Lightfoot), and that consequently this blindness might have come upon the child as a consequence of that".   On the question of who did sin, this man, or his parents, and the pre-existence and reincarnation of the soul, the Adam Clarke Commentary tells us: "The doctrine of the transmigration of souls appears to have been an article in the creed of the Pharisees, and it was pretty general both among the Greeks and the Asiatics...".  The fact that this ultra-important teaching is no longer clearly presented in the Gospels, is because these teachings were corrupted and removed from the biblical texts (see http://BibleCorruption.com ).  But it is easily proven that the modern Church has virtually nothing in common with the Original Gospel Teachings (see http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com ).  And because the Church promotes the religious doctrines of Roman Emperors, it stands today as apostates to the genuine Gospel teachings (see The Unforgivable Sin Of The Church http://BrotherOfJesus.org#TheUnforgivableSinOfTheChurch ).

The people who Christine Blasey Ford named as witnesses to the alleged assault on her, all denied the event as never taking place.  Why?  Why was the assault valid to Dr. Ford, but denied by those she named as witnesses?  Because the alleged sexual assault was drawn from an event that transpired in Dr. Ford's previous lives.  Dr. Ford could not tell how she got to -- and went home -- from the party where the sexual assault supposedly transpired, because this was not included in the Soul-Memory she recalled out of a past life that she does not consciously understand.  And if the three witnesses she named who rejected the validity of her account were indeed there with her, as she stated and affirmed they were, then this too took place in a previous life their Soul's lived.  Thus, those who have developed Soul-Memory, understand that the statements of both Judge Kavanaugh and Dr. Ford are true, and these accounts would be understood if the words of Jesus were properly translated when he stated: "He that is without sin in any lifetime, let him cast the first stone".
 
While Dr. Ford witnessed in her testimony to what she believed was a valid sexual assault which some have stated was drawn from a suppressed memory, those who presently sit in judgment are in fact being asked to render a verdict on events drawn from Dr. Ford's previous lives.  This account was recalled when Dr. Ford was in therapy -- and her best friend who she named as a witness, also noted that Dr. Ford is in need of therapy.   Dr. Ford ardently believes that the sexual assault did take place -- regardless of the statements of the witnesses who she named as being present -- because the suppressed memory was drawn from a previous life of all involved.   And if a therapist who uses age regression techniques was to help her uncover the source of the account that has plagued Dr. Ford was to help her, it would very quickly be confirmed as valid -- but not in this present lifetime.  Which means that the Democrats who have condemned Judge Kavanaugh as a sexual predator, are in fact judging an alleged event that Dr. Ford has drawn from her previous lives.   And regardless of the facts with respect to the witnesses who Dr. Ford herself named as being present during the alleged sexual assault -- the Democrats are urging the American people to ignore the witnesses and suspend the very foundation of due process -- and these same Democrats have used the account of Dr. Ford for their own political purposes, and have made Dr. Ford the true victim in this ordeal. 

 UPDATE:

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford was in therapy, and the therapist used altered-state techniques to get to her problem. Thus, what Dr. Ford is seeing is a past life memory as detailed at above.  In view of the fact that the recall of these memories are so troubling to her, she could also be experiencing a reversal of roles -- whereby, in the past life, she was the aggressor. In view of the fact that I have assisted countless people to recall their past lives over the last 40 years, a normal therapist who does not understand the source and possible reversals, can inflict greater harm on their patients.

ThoughtCrime Resistance