The Corruption Of The Words God Spoke To Mankind
The pre-Nicene biblical texts and the earliest of Church writers
prove that at the baptism of Jesus in the Jordan river, the
voice of God said: "Thou art my Son,
this day have I begotten thee". Which means that the man Jesus for the first time became the Begotten of God. Yet, the vast majority of Christians believe that God was wrong, and that their priests and a series of Roman emperors knew better than God. What are the facts? By using the
earliest of biblical manuscripts in conjunction with six (6)
separate quotations from the pre-Nicene Church Authorities prior
to the year 325AD (see The Pre-Nicene Gentile Witness
http://TheTenWords.com#Gentile ), it can be
factually demonstrated that the very scriptures that believers use today,
read differently prior to the adoption of Christianity as the
state puppet religion of the Roman government -- a Theocracy
that was first ruled over by the Emperor Constantine -- and then
a succession of equally pagan emperors who followed him. But,
the witness of the disciples of Jesus also verified the words
that God spoke to mankind when Jesus was baptized in the Jordan River. In the Book
of Acts the disciples witness to their own Anointing
(Messiah/Christ) in the words: "And
now we proclaim to you the good news: What God promised our
fathers He has fulfilled for us, their children, by raising up
Jesus. As it is written in the second Psalm: ‘You are My Son;
today I have become Your Father’" (Acts 32-33).
The disciples are affirming that the promise of God was brought
about when they too were adopted and anointed, and like Jesus they became adopted as the Sons of God and
Anointed (Messiah/Christ). Yet, the the fourth century Church of
Constantine corrupted the words that God spoke to mankind, and they recreated the man Jesus as God Incarnate.
What this confirms is the position of those who walked and
talked daily with Jesus -- those who asked him many questions --
have all witnessed that on the day that Jesus was baptized in the
Jordan, he became the Anointed (Messiah/Christ) and Adopted as the Son of God for the first
time in his existence. In further confirmation, the Adam Clark Commentary with
regard to the passage at Hebrews 1:5 which quotes the Original
Words that God spoke to Mankind, and states that if this quotation
which was used by Paul and is also confirmed in the Book of Acts
is true with respect to the words spoken of Jesus by God, then
“...the whole Christian system is
vain and baseless".
These sacred words spoken by
God to mankind were not only true of our brother Jesus, but are
also true with respect to the eventual destiny of all of mankind. The objective of the Gospels is for all
the prodigal sons and daughters to become a Congregation of Holy
and Anointed people who are taught directly by the Indwelling
Logos/Son of God. The true followers of Jesus must turn away
from the ways and thinking of this world as stated: "Therefore,
Come out from them and be separate, says the Lord. Touch no
unclean thing, and I will receive you" (2 Cor 6:17). Why is it
important for the follower of Jesus and the New Covenant to
"...be separate, [AND] ...Touch no
unclean thing"? Because the core of the New
Covenant teachings was to prepare the mind of the believer to be
taught directly by the One Teacher as stated:
"It is written in the prophets, 'And
they shall all be taught by God'" (John 6:45 see
The One Teacher
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#TheOneTeacher ). And thus,
when the Church corrupted the Words spoken directly to mankind
by God, the congregation of believers were cast into a Spiritual
Diaspora which they have yet to emerge out of.
What is the evidence that the above is the true Words that God
spoke to mankind? In addition to the most ancient copies of the
Gospels, this wording which reflected the original non-corrupted
Words of God to Mankind is found in the writings of six (6)
pre-Nicene Church Fathers who copied the statements of God into
their own writings (see The Gentile Church Witness
http://TheTenWords.com#Gentile ). What this means is
that what the original pre-Nicene Gospels therefore stated was
that Jesus was a holy man who became the Anointed
(Messiah/Christ) at his baptism in the Jordan river. And the
fact that the copies of the scriptures that were used prior to
the fourth century by the Church Fathers reflect the original
words of God, demonstrate that it was the Roman Emperor
Constantine who was himself a Mithraic sun-worshipper, demanded
that the words spoken by God to mankind be changed to make them
reflect the doctrines of Mithraism (see The Emergence Of
Mithraic Christianity
http://CausalFactor.Nazirene.org#MithraicChristianity
). Constantine believed that Jesus was the latest incarnation of
the Mithraic sun-god, and that the original disciples of Jesus
and the Spiritual Christians were wrong.
In order to enable the Congregation of believers to prove and
confirm that the Mithraic infused doctrines of the Church was
not true, the Hand of God moved and we were provided the witness
of the The Essenes And The Dead Sea Scrolls
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#Essene . But to the
spiritual demise of the faith-based modern believers, the Church
has continued to totally ignored the historical facts and truths
that was given unto them. As just one example of the facts that
have been confirmed, is the witness of Prof. John Allegro who
was quoted as saying that what has been revealed in the
discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls is a great amount of
overwhelming evidence that “...may
upset a great many basic teachings of the Christian Church. This
in turn would greatly upset many Christian Theologians and
believers. The heart of the matter is, in fact, the source and
originality of Christian doctrine” (August 1966
issue of Harpers Magazine). What all the many recent
archaeological discoveries have confirmed and demonstrated is
that Prof. Allegro was correct in his assertion that our
modern-day understanding of “the
source and originality of Christian doctrine” is
defective -- and the doctrines of the modern Church have
virtually nothing in common with the Original Gospel teachings
(see
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com ).
Those who walked and talked daily with the man Jesus, had
nothing in common with the Mithraic based doctrines of the
modern Church. Why? Because their understanding was in perfect
harmony with the Words that God spoke to mankind at Jesus'
baptism in the Jordan. Historically, those who were taught
directly by the man Jesus understood that he was a Holy Man who
fulfilled the Law within his own Mind and Being, and became
At-One with the Indwelling Logos (aka Son of God). In fact, the
whole foundation of the New Covenant was built upon the
foundation that each person by birth-right, possesses the innate
ability to learn directly from the Indwelling Logos (a.k.a., Son
of God). And thus, the original disciples and followers of Jesus
who walked and talked with him daily, were known as Ebionites
and Nazirenes
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#Ebionite -- meaning
the "poor ones" to the thinking and ways of this world
who strove to fulfill the adage to be in the world and not of
it. In the same way that Jesus taught that he was our brother --
i.e., "Go instead to my brothers and
tell them, 'I am returning to my Father and your Father, to my
God and your God'" (John 20:17) -- and his
disciples understood that Jesus became the Anointed
(Messiah/Christ) by fulfilling the spiritual meaning and essence
of the Law within his own mind and being -- i.e., quoting the
Church writer Hippolytus on the Ebionites: that Jesus
"...was justified by fulfilling the
Law. He was the Christ of God, since not one of the rest of
mankind had observed the Law completely. Had any one else
fulfilled the commandments of the Law, he would have been the
Christ, for they assert that our Lord Himself was a man in like
sense with all humanity" (see Hippolytus, Refut.
Omn. Haer. vii. 34). One of the most important elements to this
original teaching was not only that Jesus was a man who became
of an Enlightened Anointed Mind (Christ/Messiah) by fulfilling
the Law within his own mind and being, but also that if
"...any one else fulfilled the
commandments of the Law, he would have been the Christ"
-- and this ultra-important teaching is reflective of the
Words that God spoke to mankind when the man Jesus became the
first of the prodigal sons to become At-One with the Indwelling
Logos/Son of God - which set the example and standard for all
other prodigal sons and daughters to follow. With respect to the
Ebionites, it is documented that the mother and brothers of
Jesus were Ebionites -- and because they were faithful to the
words that God spoke to mankind, the historian portrays them as
being “…rejected from one religion
as apostates, and from the other as heretics”
(Gibbon: Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire, v.1, p.416). Anyone
who embraces the Original Teachings of the Gospel today, will be
rejected and banned from the Churches (see The Reality Of The
Original Gospels
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com ).
Part 2: God's Words Corrupted To Recreate Jesus As God-Incarnate
The Old Testament prediction made reference to in the above quotation by Lactantius is found at Ps 2:7 which reads: "I will declare the decree: the Lord has said to me, 'You are My Son, today I have begotten You'". And what few Christians today realize is that most ancient copies of the New Testament scriptures does in fact confirm the prophesy that these words were indeed spoken at his baptism when the Father said of Jesus: "Thou art My beloved Son, to-day have I begotten Thee". Moreover, these words which were spoken to Jesus are actually confirmed at two other places in the New Testament. At the very beginning of Paul's Epistle to the Hebrews (1:5) we find the statement with respect to what was spoken to Jesus: “For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son”. Contrary to the Apostle's conclusions upon which the Epistle to the Hebrews is founded, because this statement which was reportedly spoken from heaven was altered by the later church, nowhere in our present day translations are these words said to Jesus. Yet, there is a parallel account in Acts that speaks of the disciples of Jesus being adopted by God in the same manner as Jesus himself was adopted as the very first of the prodigal sons to return to the Edenic Kingdom of Origination: “God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath raised up Jesus again; as it is also written in the second psalm, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee” (Acts 13:33). In the Acts of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul (234 A.D.), it says: “Him therefore to whom the Father said, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten Thee, the chief priests through envy crucified.” Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VIII/Apocrypha of the New Testament/Acts of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul/Acts of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul,
In a writing by Justin (died 165 A.D.) known as the Dialogue of Justin with Tryphon, A Jew, in chapter LXXXVIII, Justin writes about Jesus, clearly referencing the Gospels’ baptism accounts: "He was in the habit of working as a carpenter when among men, making ploughs and yokes; by which He taught the symbols of righteousness and an active life; but then the Holy Ghost, and for man’s sake, as I formerly stated, lighted on Him in the form of a dove, and there came at the same instant from the heavens a voice, which was uttered also by David when he spoke, personating Christ, what the Father would say to Him: ‘Thou art My Son: this day have I begottenThee.’" (Justin, Trypho) Justin then goes on to explain to Trypho the Jew-- once more obviously quoting the original form of Matthew 3:17 and Luke 3:22: "For this devil, when [Jesus] went up from the river Jordan, at the time when the voice spake to Him, “Thou art my Son: this day have I begotten Thee,” is recorded in the memoirs of the apostles to have come to Him and tempted Him, even so far as to say to Him, “Worship me;” and Christ answered him, “Get thee behind me, Satan: thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve.” (Id., ch. CII.) Others who found the same passage in Matthew are Juvencus, Evangeliorum Libri Quattor, I 360-64 and Hilary, De Trinitate, VIII, 25, Tyconius, Reg. 1
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home