Does the Gospels supply an
answer to the Christian dilemma of the True Sabbath? Paul writes that the
Sabbath celebrated by the Jews is an allegorical representation of the
Sabbath, as seen in his words that it is a
"...shadow of things to come"
(Col 2:17 KJV). The Gospels are spiritual writings -- and they often
intentionally conflict with what would be understood from a literal or
historical perspective, in order to force the reader to seek the spiritual
meaning. The prediction was that the Son of Man would be three days in the
tomb -- and yet, if you count the days as reported in the scriptures, they
are two. And this is because the Christians who read the scriptures in the
manner of the Pharisees who threw away the Key of Knowledge, not only do not
understand the spiritual meaning of the three days, but they further do not
understand the portrayal of a Sabbath following the Passover. They therefore
attempt to doctrinally force the interpretation the following day after the
Sabbath as the first day of the week -- or for those who worship the sun-god
in the manner of the pagan Christians, Sunday. On the other hand, the Greek
word used to describe the day of the supposed resurrection, is
mia ton
sabbaton -- or, if literally translated, "one of the Sabbaths". But the
conflict over the day of the week is seen in the Christians inability to
understand what is meant by
"one of the Sabbaths" -- which is exactly how
the Greek text reads. And the grave misunderstanding of most Bible readers
is seen when they fail to perceive that the allegorical symbol of the
Sabbath is not the actual Sabbath that is the objective of the scriptures
which is portrayed in the biblical term
"one of the Sabbaths". As noted in
many places in this article, Eden is the embodiment of the Sabbath -- and it
is the return to Eden while still alive in the body (see
http://GateOfEden.com),
that is the true objective of the scriptures and the teachings of Jesus and
TheWay. From a true spiritual perspective, the Jews have never celebrated a
Sabbath -- and what they observe, is an allegorical portrayal of the Sabbath
that they lack the depth of understanding to comprehend the meaning of. And
this reality which is not understood by either the Jews, or the pagan
Christians, is also presented in the meaning of the verse that was removed
from the Gospel of Luke by the sun-worshipping Christians -- i.e.,
"On the
same day, He (Jesus) beholding a man laboring on the Sabbath, said to him:
Man if thou knowest what thou doest, blessed art thou; if however thou dost
not know, cursed art thou and a transgressor of the law" (see
http://BibleCorruption.com ).
If the Passover is correctly embraced from a spiritual perspective (see
http://Ebionite.com/Easter.htm )
-- in contradistinction to the allegorical Passover of the Jews -- then the
disciple has overcome, and achieved the next level of birth -- and to him,
there is nothing but Sabbaths. After the Celebration of the True Sabbath
which can only be accomplished in the fulfillment of the Laws within one's
self, there is no more counting of days, weeks, months and years -- i.e.,
"But now after you have known God, or rather are known by God, how is it
that you turn again to the weak and beggarly elements, to which you desire
again to be in bondage? You observe days and months and seasons and years. I
am afraid for you, lest I have labored for you in vain" (Gal 4:9-11 NKJ).
The Pharisees, who were condemned because of their carnal and ritualistic
interpretation of the scriptures, celebrate an allegorical Sabbath that is
of the flesh -- i.e., what Paul portrays as a
"shadow" of the True Sabbath
that is Spiritual. The Disciples of Jesus are to strive to bring about the
True Spiritual Sabbath of Completion -- and after you achieve this Spiritual
Sabbath, there is no more days of the week -- but only the abiding eternal
rest. And this is why the Sabbath is portrayed as following the Passover in
the Gospels, and the next day is portrayed as
"one of the Sabbaths". Among
other things, what this means is that there is absolutely no basis for
observing the day of the sun-god -- i.e., Sunday -- except, of course, if
you worship the sun-god in the manner of the pagan Church of Rome. And the
fact that you can't count the days where the Son of Man was in the tomb
three days -- and make it the day of the sun-god -- simply because you read
the scriptures in the same manner as the Pharisees -- totally alienates the
believers of the Church from even the very objects and spiritual essence of
the teachings of Jesus and TheWay.
The scriptures were
intentionally composed so as to purposely inhibit readers from reading and
believing what is literally written in a linear interpretation. Herbert W.
Armstrong who was of course a literalist, proclaimed: There were no
eye-witnesses to the resurrection. Even so-called
"apostolic fathers" had no
source of information save that record which is today available to us.
Tradition, then, must be dismissed (see The Resurrection Was Not On Sunday).
Yet, Armstrong was wrong -- i.e, (1) the allegorical account was composed in
this manner for an important reason; (2) and any seeker who prevails over
their physical organic limitations, learns the truth about the scriptures
and their allegorical nature and higher purpose. Therefore, if you want to
know the Truth, you will have to either (1) ask one of the authors of the
scriptures; (2) enter into Spirit and examine the actual historical record
that is not recorded in the allegorical scriptures; (3) or seek instruction
directly from the Indwelling Logos/Son of God/True Prophet (see
http://OuterDarkness.Nazirene.org/#TrueProphet ).
While Armstrong from one
perspective had it right, the greater problem is seen in the fact that he
did not understand what the scriptures are presenting. While the scriptures
state that Jesus would be in the grave three days and three nights, only two
days are presented in the literal texts. Provoking both Armstrong and many
other Fundamentalist Christians to develop a great many dogmatic theories as
to why this contradiction in the scriptures exists. Armstrong writes: A
vital text proving that there were two Sabbaths in that week has been
obscured by almost every translation into English. Only Ferrar Fenton's
version has this point correct. Turn to Matthew 28:1. In the common versions
it says, "In the end of the Sabbath," or more correctly, "after the
Sabbath." Notice that both of these renderings use the singular -- Sabbath.
But in the original Greek the word is in the PLURAL. Fenton renders it
correctly by saying, "After the SABBATHS," although the remaining part of
the verse he has not translated quite correctly. In a foot-note to this
text, he says, "The Greek original is in the plural, 'Sabbaths'." When the
scriptures are properly understood within the context of the Greek term mia
ton sabbaton as stated at the subheading Spiritual Sabbath, the correct
understanding would be rendered for first day of the week as "one of the
Sabbaths".
In order to celebrate and
observe the Real Sabbath -- i.e., Spiritual Sabbath -- one must achieve the
Final Stage of Birth which would constitute a return to Eden from the
perspective of the fulfillment of the Laws and the reality of the Omega of
Creation within one's self And when the Ebionite Nazirenes (see
http://Ebionite.com ) attested to the
fact that this is what the historical man Jesus accomplished within himself
-- it is this fulfilling the Spiritual Sabbath wthin himself that the
historical man Jesus accomplished. To begin: Herbert Armstrong did not at
all understand WHY the scriptures are an allegorical account -- simply
because the article An Inconvenient Truth (
http://AnInconvenientTruth.org )
had not yet been written which explains the higher purpose and objective of
the scriptures. Mr. Armstrong had never known or spoken to the original
authors. He did not believe in the Inner Kingdom -- or the reality that when
the scriptures are used as the Key of Knowledge (
http://KeyOfKnowledge.org )
and is turned within one's own mind and being, that mankind as the lost
prodigal son possesses the innate ability to enter and return to the Edenic
Kingdom of Origination while still physically alive in the body-vessel (see
http://GateOfEden.com ).
Like the vast majority of Christians, Armstrong was robbed of the a more
spiritual understanding of the scriptures by virtue of the corruption of the
scriptures by the scribes of the Orthodox Church (see
http://BibleCorruption.com ),
and the later directives of a series of Roman Emperors (see
http://reincarnation.nazirene.org/#emperors )
-- to the degree, that even those Words which were alleged to be spoken
directly from God to mankind, were corrupted and changed in order to promote
the Jesus-god of Pagan Rome.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home